The APIC research agenda: Results from a national survey

Marc Oliver Wright, Eileen Carter, Monika Pogorzelska, Cathryn Murphy, Marilyn Hanchett, Patricia W. Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Research is an integral component of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) Strategic Plan 2020. As the role of the infection preventionist (IP) has evolved toward consumers and implementers of research, it becomes increasingly necessary to assess which topics require further evidence and how best APIC can assist IPs. In 2010, APIC determined that the research priorities first described in 2000 needed to be re-evaluated. Methods: A 33-question Web-based survey was developed and distributed via e-mail to APIC members in March 2011. The survey contained sections inquiring about respondents' demographics, familiarity with implementation science, and infection prevention research priorities. Priorities identified by a Delphi study 10 years ago were re-ranked, and open-ended items were used to identify new research priorities and understand how APIC could best serve its members in relation to research. Results: Seven hundred one members responded. Behavioral management science, surveillance standards, and infection prevention resource optimization were the highest ranked priorities and relatively unchanged from 2000. Proposed additional research topics focused on achieving standardization in infection prevention practices and program resource allocation. The majority of respondents described APIC's role in the field of research as a disseminator of low-cost, highly accessible education to its members. Conclusion: This report should be used as a roadmap for APIC leadership as it provides suggestions on how APIC may best direct the association's research program. The major research priorities described and ranked in 2000 continue to challenge IPs. APIC can best serve its members by disseminating research findings in a cost-effective and easily accessed manner. Recurrent assessments of research priorities can help guide researchers and policy makers and help determine which topics will best support successful infection prevention processes and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-313
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Infection Control
Epidemiology
Research
Infection
Surveys and Questionnaires
Delphi Technique
losigame
Behavioral Sciences
Costs and Cost Analysis
Resource Allocation
Postal Service
Administrative Personnel
Research Personnel
Demography
Education

Cite this

Wright, M. O., Carter, E., Pogorzelska, M., Murphy, C., Hanchett, M., & Stone, P. W. (2012). The APIC research agenda: Results from a national survey. American Journal of Infection Control, 40(4), 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.005
Wright, Marc Oliver ; Carter, Eileen ; Pogorzelska, Monika ; Murphy, Cathryn ; Hanchett, Marilyn ; Stone, Patricia W. / The APIC research agenda : Results from a national survey. In: American Journal of Infection Control. 2012 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 309-313.
@article{483c364a60e74c9abbab754532fe0b28,
title = "The APIC research agenda: Results from a national survey",
abstract = "Background: Research is an integral component of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) Strategic Plan 2020. As the role of the infection preventionist (IP) has evolved toward consumers and implementers of research, it becomes increasingly necessary to assess which topics require further evidence and how best APIC can assist IPs. In 2010, APIC determined that the research priorities first described in 2000 needed to be re-evaluated. Methods: A 33-question Web-based survey was developed and distributed via e-mail to APIC members in March 2011. The survey contained sections inquiring about respondents' demographics, familiarity with implementation science, and infection prevention research priorities. Priorities identified by a Delphi study 10 years ago were re-ranked, and open-ended items were used to identify new research priorities and understand how APIC could best serve its members in relation to research. Results: Seven hundred one members responded. Behavioral management science, surveillance standards, and infection prevention resource optimization were the highest ranked priorities and relatively unchanged from 2000. Proposed additional research topics focused on achieving standardization in infection prevention practices and program resource allocation. The majority of respondents described APIC's role in the field of research as a disseminator of low-cost, highly accessible education to its members. Conclusion: This report should be used as a roadmap for APIC leadership as it provides suggestions on how APIC may best direct the association's research program. The major research priorities described and ranked in 2000 continue to challenge IPs. APIC can best serve its members by disseminating research findings in a cost-effective and easily accessed manner. Recurrent assessments of research priorities can help guide researchers and policy makers and help determine which topics will best support successful infection prevention processes and outcomes.",
author = "Wright, {Marc Oliver} and Eileen Carter and Monika Pogorzelska and Cathryn Murphy and Marilyn Hanchett and Stone, {Patricia W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.005",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "309--313",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0161-6005",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Wright, MO, Carter, E, Pogorzelska, M, Murphy, C, Hanchett, M & Stone, PW 2012, 'The APIC research agenda: Results from a national survey' American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.005

The APIC research agenda : Results from a national survey. / Wright, Marc Oliver; Carter, Eileen; Pogorzelska, Monika; Murphy, Cathryn; Hanchett, Marilyn; Stone, Patricia W.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.05.2012, p. 309-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The APIC research agenda

T2 - Results from a national survey

AU - Wright, Marc Oliver

AU - Carter, Eileen

AU - Pogorzelska, Monika

AU - Murphy, Cathryn

AU - Hanchett, Marilyn

AU - Stone, Patricia W.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Background: Research is an integral component of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) Strategic Plan 2020. As the role of the infection preventionist (IP) has evolved toward consumers and implementers of research, it becomes increasingly necessary to assess which topics require further evidence and how best APIC can assist IPs. In 2010, APIC determined that the research priorities first described in 2000 needed to be re-evaluated. Methods: A 33-question Web-based survey was developed and distributed via e-mail to APIC members in March 2011. The survey contained sections inquiring about respondents' demographics, familiarity with implementation science, and infection prevention research priorities. Priorities identified by a Delphi study 10 years ago were re-ranked, and open-ended items were used to identify new research priorities and understand how APIC could best serve its members in relation to research. Results: Seven hundred one members responded. Behavioral management science, surveillance standards, and infection prevention resource optimization were the highest ranked priorities and relatively unchanged from 2000. Proposed additional research topics focused on achieving standardization in infection prevention practices and program resource allocation. The majority of respondents described APIC's role in the field of research as a disseminator of low-cost, highly accessible education to its members. Conclusion: This report should be used as a roadmap for APIC leadership as it provides suggestions on how APIC may best direct the association's research program. The major research priorities described and ranked in 2000 continue to challenge IPs. APIC can best serve its members by disseminating research findings in a cost-effective and easily accessed manner. Recurrent assessments of research priorities can help guide researchers and policy makers and help determine which topics will best support successful infection prevention processes and outcomes.

AB - Background: Research is an integral component of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) Strategic Plan 2020. As the role of the infection preventionist (IP) has evolved toward consumers and implementers of research, it becomes increasingly necessary to assess which topics require further evidence and how best APIC can assist IPs. In 2010, APIC determined that the research priorities first described in 2000 needed to be re-evaluated. Methods: A 33-question Web-based survey was developed and distributed via e-mail to APIC members in March 2011. The survey contained sections inquiring about respondents' demographics, familiarity with implementation science, and infection prevention research priorities. Priorities identified by a Delphi study 10 years ago were re-ranked, and open-ended items were used to identify new research priorities and understand how APIC could best serve its members in relation to research. Results: Seven hundred one members responded. Behavioral management science, surveillance standards, and infection prevention resource optimization were the highest ranked priorities and relatively unchanged from 2000. Proposed additional research topics focused on achieving standardization in infection prevention practices and program resource allocation. The majority of respondents described APIC's role in the field of research as a disseminator of low-cost, highly accessible education to its members. Conclusion: This report should be used as a roadmap for APIC leadership as it provides suggestions on how APIC may best direct the association's research program. The major research priorities described and ranked in 2000 continue to challenge IPs. APIC can best serve its members by disseminating research findings in a cost-effective and easily accessed manner. Recurrent assessments of research priorities can help guide researchers and policy makers and help determine which topics will best support successful infection prevention processes and outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860365583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.005

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 309

EP - 313

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0161-6005

IS - 4

ER -