The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury

Dale Lovell, Darron Shields, Belinda Beck, Ross Cuneo, Chris McLellan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory response and mechanical efficiency (ME) of highly trained spinal cord injured (SCI) handcyclists with untrained SCI men. Ten trained handcyclists (≥2 years training) and ten untrained but physically active SCI men completed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion and a sub-maximal test (50 and 80 W) on an electromagnetically braked arm ergometer. The trained participants completed a questionnaire on their training and race performance over the past year, including average training volume (in kilometers), number of training sessions per week and best 20-km time trial. The trained SCI men had higher V̇O 2 peak, peak power (p ≤ 0.001) and peak heart rate (p = 0.021) compared to the untrained SCI men. The trained men had higher (p ≤ 0.001) ME at 50 W (14.1 ± 2.0%) and 80 W (17.2 ± 2.6) compared to the untrained men (50 W; 12.5 ± 1.8 and 80 W; 15.7 ± 2.1). Peak power (r = -0.87, p = 0.001), V̇O2 peak (r = -0.67, p = 0.033) and ME (r = -0.58, p = 0.041) were negatively correlated with the participants best 20-km time trial. Multiple linear regression indicated peak power (p < 0.001) and V̇O2 peak (p = 0.021) were the best predictors (87%) of 20-km time trial performance. Highly trained SCI handcyclists have a greater aerobic capacity and ME compared to untrained SCI, and are able to reach their maximum age-predicted heart rate during an incremental exercise test. The best predictor of 20 km race performance in highly trained SCI handcyclists is peak power attained during an incremental exercise test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3431-3437
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume112
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Spinal Cord
Exercise Test
Heart Rate
Linear Models

Cite this

Lovell, Dale ; Shields, Darron ; Beck, Belinda ; Cuneo, Ross ; McLellan, Chris. / The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury. In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2012 ; Vol. 112, No. 9. pp. 3431-3437.
@article{cae06dade9bc43df90e0fb22946ac017,
title = "The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory response and mechanical efficiency (ME) of highly trained spinal cord injured (SCI) handcyclists with untrained SCI men. Ten trained handcyclists (≥2 years training) and ten untrained but physically active SCI men completed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion and a sub-maximal test (50 and 80 W) on an electromagnetically braked arm ergometer. The trained participants completed a questionnaire on their training and race performance over the past year, including average training volume (in kilometers), number of training sessions per week and best 20-km time trial. The trained SCI men had higher V̇O 2 peak, peak power (p ≤ 0.001) and peak heart rate (p = 0.021) compared to the untrained SCI men. The trained men had higher (p ≤ 0.001) ME at 50 W (14.1 ± 2.0{\%}) and 80 W (17.2 ± 2.6) compared to the untrained men (50 W; 12.5 ± 1.8 and 80 W; 15.7 ± 2.1). Peak power (r = -0.87, p = 0.001), V̇O2 peak (r = -0.67, p = 0.033) and ME (r = -0.58, p = 0.041) were negatively correlated with the participants best 20-km time trial. Multiple linear regression indicated peak power (p < 0.001) and V̇O2 peak (p = 0.021) were the best predictors (87{\%}) of 20-km time trial performance. Highly trained SCI handcyclists have a greater aerobic capacity and ME compared to untrained SCI, and are able to reach their maximum age-predicted heart rate during an incremental exercise test. The best predictor of 20 km race performance in highly trained SCI handcyclists is peak power attained during an incremental exercise test.",
author = "Dale Lovell and Darron Shields and Belinda Beck and Ross Cuneo and Chris McLellan",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-012-2324-x",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "3431--3437",
journal = "Arbeitsphysiologie",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "9",

}

The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury. / Lovell, Dale; Shields, Darron; Beck, Belinda; Cuneo, Ross; McLellan, Chris.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 112, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 3431-3437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury

AU - Lovell, Dale

AU - Shields, Darron

AU - Beck, Belinda

AU - Cuneo, Ross

AU - McLellan, Chris

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory response and mechanical efficiency (ME) of highly trained spinal cord injured (SCI) handcyclists with untrained SCI men. Ten trained handcyclists (≥2 years training) and ten untrained but physically active SCI men completed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion and a sub-maximal test (50 and 80 W) on an electromagnetically braked arm ergometer. The trained participants completed a questionnaire on their training and race performance over the past year, including average training volume (in kilometers), number of training sessions per week and best 20-km time trial. The trained SCI men had higher V̇O 2 peak, peak power (p ≤ 0.001) and peak heart rate (p = 0.021) compared to the untrained SCI men. The trained men had higher (p ≤ 0.001) ME at 50 W (14.1 ± 2.0%) and 80 W (17.2 ± 2.6) compared to the untrained men (50 W; 12.5 ± 1.8 and 80 W; 15.7 ± 2.1). Peak power (r = -0.87, p = 0.001), V̇O2 peak (r = -0.67, p = 0.033) and ME (r = -0.58, p = 0.041) were negatively correlated with the participants best 20-km time trial. Multiple linear regression indicated peak power (p < 0.001) and V̇O2 peak (p = 0.021) were the best predictors (87%) of 20-km time trial performance. Highly trained SCI handcyclists have a greater aerobic capacity and ME compared to untrained SCI, and are able to reach their maximum age-predicted heart rate during an incremental exercise test. The best predictor of 20 km race performance in highly trained SCI handcyclists is peak power attained during an incremental exercise test.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory response and mechanical efficiency (ME) of highly trained spinal cord injured (SCI) handcyclists with untrained SCI men. Ten trained handcyclists (≥2 years training) and ten untrained but physically active SCI men completed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion and a sub-maximal test (50 and 80 W) on an electromagnetically braked arm ergometer. The trained participants completed a questionnaire on their training and race performance over the past year, including average training volume (in kilometers), number of training sessions per week and best 20-km time trial. The trained SCI men had higher V̇O 2 peak, peak power (p ≤ 0.001) and peak heart rate (p = 0.021) compared to the untrained SCI men. The trained men had higher (p ≤ 0.001) ME at 50 W (14.1 ± 2.0%) and 80 W (17.2 ± 2.6) compared to the untrained men (50 W; 12.5 ± 1.8 and 80 W; 15.7 ± 2.1). Peak power (r = -0.87, p = 0.001), V̇O2 peak (r = -0.67, p = 0.033) and ME (r = -0.58, p = 0.041) were negatively correlated with the participants best 20-km time trial. Multiple linear regression indicated peak power (p < 0.001) and V̇O2 peak (p = 0.021) were the best predictors (87%) of 20-km time trial performance. Highly trained SCI handcyclists have a greater aerobic capacity and ME compared to untrained SCI, and are able to reach their maximum age-predicted heart rate during an incremental exercise test. The best predictor of 20 km race performance in highly trained SCI handcyclists is peak power attained during an incremental exercise test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865394336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-012-2324-x

DO - 10.1007/s00421-012-2324-x

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 3431

EP - 3437

JO - Arbeitsphysiologie

JF - Arbeitsphysiologie

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 9

ER -