The absolute violation: Why torture must be prohibited

Richard S. Matthews

Research output: Book/ReportBookResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

State torture has found an increasing number of defenders in law, philosophy, and public policy. Their defences often ignore the empirical literature on torture and thus misunderstand its nature and the damage it does, as well as accepting the illusory benefits it promises. Richard Matthews challenges the increasing acceptability of state-sponsored torture interrogation, repudiating any possible justifications. He confronts its various supporters - ticking time bomb and tragic choice theorists, utilitarians, legal scholars - and draws from philosophy, medicine, psychiatry, survivor and torturer narratives, history, feminism, the experience of working intelligence officials, anthropology, and game theory to illustrate that no moral justification for torture can be supported. The Absolute Violation is essential reading for philosophers, lawyers, judges, human rights activists, military, police and intelligence officers, medical professionals, and anyone who is interested in forcefully countering the recent trend towards moral justification of torture.

Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationMontreal
PublisherMcGill-Queen's University Press
Number of pages238
ISBN (Print)9780773534223
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

torture
game theory
psychiatry
feminism
lawyer
anthropology
intelligence
damages
police
human rights
public policy
Military
medicine
narrative
Law
trend
history
experience
philosophy

Cite this

Matthews, R. S. (2008). The absolute violation: Why torture must be prohibited. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Matthews, Richard S. / The absolute violation : Why torture must be prohibited. Montreal : McGill-Queen's University Press, 2008. 238 p.
@book{db8bb88ffd734f17bad9dd3c1732707c,
title = "The absolute violation: Why torture must be prohibited",
abstract = "State torture has found an increasing number of defenders in law, philosophy, and public policy. Their defences often ignore the empirical literature on torture and thus misunderstand its nature and the damage it does, as well as accepting the illusory benefits it promises. Richard Matthews challenges the increasing acceptability of state-sponsored torture interrogation, repudiating any possible justifications. He confronts its various supporters - ticking time bomb and tragic choice theorists, utilitarians, legal scholars - and draws from philosophy, medicine, psychiatry, survivor and torturer narratives, history, feminism, the experience of working intelligence officials, anthropology, and game theory to illustrate that no moral justification for torture can be supported. The Absolute Violation is essential reading for philosophers, lawyers, judges, human rights activists, military, police and intelligence officers, medical professionals, and anyone who is interested in forcefully countering the recent trend towards moral justification of torture.",
author = "Matthews, {Richard S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780773534223",
publisher = "McGill-Queen's University Press",

}

Matthews, RS 2008, The absolute violation: Why torture must be prohibited. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal.

The absolute violation : Why torture must be prohibited. / Matthews, Richard S.

Montreal : McGill-Queen's University Press, 2008. 238 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBookResearchpeer-review

TY - BOOK

T1 - The absolute violation

T2 - Why torture must be prohibited

AU - Matthews, Richard S.

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - State torture has found an increasing number of defenders in law, philosophy, and public policy. Their defences often ignore the empirical literature on torture and thus misunderstand its nature and the damage it does, as well as accepting the illusory benefits it promises. Richard Matthews challenges the increasing acceptability of state-sponsored torture interrogation, repudiating any possible justifications. He confronts its various supporters - ticking time bomb and tragic choice theorists, utilitarians, legal scholars - and draws from philosophy, medicine, psychiatry, survivor and torturer narratives, history, feminism, the experience of working intelligence officials, anthropology, and game theory to illustrate that no moral justification for torture can be supported. The Absolute Violation is essential reading for philosophers, lawyers, judges, human rights activists, military, police and intelligence officers, medical professionals, and anyone who is interested in forcefully countering the recent trend towards moral justification of torture.

AB - State torture has found an increasing number of defenders in law, philosophy, and public policy. Their defences often ignore the empirical literature on torture and thus misunderstand its nature and the damage it does, as well as accepting the illusory benefits it promises. Richard Matthews challenges the increasing acceptability of state-sponsored torture interrogation, repudiating any possible justifications. He confronts its various supporters - ticking time bomb and tragic choice theorists, utilitarians, legal scholars - and draws from philosophy, medicine, psychiatry, survivor and torturer narratives, history, feminism, the experience of working intelligence officials, anthropology, and game theory to illustrate that no moral justification for torture can be supported. The Absolute Violation is essential reading for philosophers, lawyers, judges, human rights activists, military, police and intelligence officers, medical professionals, and anyone who is interested in forcefully countering the recent trend towards moral justification of torture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897303972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Book

SN - 9780773534223

BT - The absolute violation

PB - McGill-Queen's University Press

CY - Montreal

ER -

Matthews RS. The absolute violation: Why torture must be prohibited. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2008. 238 p.