Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain

Zoe A. Michaleff, Christopher Harrison, Helena Britt, Chung Wei Christine Lin, Chris G. Maher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain (LBP) but it is unclear if general practitioner's (GP) care is similar. While GP's management of LBP is well documented, little is known about GP's management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP's management of new neck pain and compare this to GP's management of new LBP in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010. Methods: All GP-patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or LBP problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations. Results: General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and LBP problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP-patient encounters, respectively. GP's primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and LBP problems and referred approximately 25% of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new LBP were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests. Conclusions: This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and LBP, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1283-1289
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neck Pain
Back Pain
General Practitioners
Low Back Pain
Guidelines
Time Management
Surveys and Questionnaires
Allied Health Personnel
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Neck
Referral and Consultation
Pathology
Therapeutics

Cite this

Michaleff, Zoe A. ; Harrison, Christopher ; Britt, Helena ; Lin, Chung Wei Christine ; Maher, Chris G. / Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain. In: European Spine Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 21, No. 7. pp. 1283-1289.
@article{0c1a9915e02845ccb49f3e70c51747e1,
title = "Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain",
abstract = "Purpose: Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain (LBP) but it is unclear if general practitioner's (GP) care is similar. While GP's management of LBP is well documented, little is known about GP's management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP's management of new neck pain and compare this to GP's management of new LBP in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010. Methods: All GP-patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or LBP problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations. Results: General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and LBP problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP-patient encounters, respectively. GP's primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and LBP problems and referred approximately 25{\%} of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new LBP were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests. Conclusions: This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and LBP, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.",
author = "Michaleff, {Zoe A.} and Christopher Harrison and Helena Britt and Lin, {Chung Wei Christine} and Maher, {Chris G.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-011-2135-5",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1283--1289",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "7",

}

Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain. / Michaleff, Zoe A.; Harrison, Christopher; Britt, Helena; Lin, Chung Wei Christine; Maher, Chris G.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 21, No. 7, 01.07.2012, p. 1283-1289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain

AU - Michaleff, Zoe A.

AU - Harrison, Christopher

AU - Britt, Helena

AU - Lin, Chung Wei Christine

AU - Maher, Chris G.

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Purpose: Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain (LBP) but it is unclear if general practitioner's (GP) care is similar. While GP's management of LBP is well documented, little is known about GP's management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP's management of new neck pain and compare this to GP's management of new LBP in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010. Methods: All GP-patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or LBP problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations. Results: General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and LBP problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP-patient encounters, respectively. GP's primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and LBP problems and referred approximately 25% of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new LBP were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests. Conclusions: This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and LBP, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.

AB - Purpose: Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain (LBP) but it is unclear if general practitioner's (GP) care is similar. While GP's management of LBP is well documented, little is known about GP's management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP's management of new neck pain and compare this to GP's management of new LBP in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010. Methods: All GP-patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or LBP problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations. Results: General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and LBP problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP-patient encounters, respectively. GP's primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and LBP problems and referred approximately 25% of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new LBP were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests. Conclusions: This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and LBP, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865046060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-011-2135-5

DO - 10.1007/s00586-011-2135-5

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1283

EP - 1289

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 7

ER -