Teaching, skills and outcomes in Australian property law units: A survey of current approaches

Penny Carruthers, Natalie Skead, Kathrine Galloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Globally, higher education and legal education have embraced the development of skills as an integral part of student learning. It is no longer enough that graduates enter the workplace armed only with a body of disembodied discipline knowledge. It is expected that graduates have complementary skills – both generic and professional. These skills do not appear ‘magically’; rather it is the role of the law teacher to facilitate students’ development of these skills during their studies. The imperative to design curricula that embed skills development has become more urgent with the advent of discipline standards and the new quality regime in Australia. This paper reports on a survey of Australian property law teachers undertaken in late 2011. The paper analyses teaching methods, skills and outcomes in the teaching of property law. In particular, the paper considers how property teachers deal with the development of skills in the property law curriculum, testing Gray’s suggestion that ‘[i]t is in Property Law that consciously or unconsciously the student learns a basic competence in a number of skills which are of immense importance in later life.’(1) If this is true, this paper asks, how and to what extent do Australian property law curricula embrace the teaching of skills?
Original languageEnglish
JournalQueensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Law
Teaching
curriculum
teacher
graduate
student
teaching method
education
workplace
regime
learning

Cite this

@article{a212daf5a66e426a8b469c08dd438083,
title = "Teaching, skills and outcomes in Australian property law units: A survey of current approaches",
abstract = "Globally, higher education and legal education have embraced the development of skills as an integral part of student learning. It is no longer enough that graduates enter the workplace armed only with a body of disembodied discipline knowledge. It is expected that graduates have complementary skills – both generic and professional. These skills do not appear ‘magically’; rather it is the role of the law teacher to facilitate students’ development of these skills during their studies. The imperative to design curricula that embed skills development has become more urgent with the advent of discipline standards and the new quality regime in Australia. This paper reports on a survey of Australian property law teachers undertaken in late 2011. The paper analyses teaching methods, skills and outcomes in the teaching of property law. In particular, the paper considers how property teachers deal with the development of skills in the property law curriculum, testing Gray’s suggestion that ‘[i]t is in Property Law that consciously or unconsciously the student learns a basic competence in a number of skills which are of immense importance in later life.’(1) If this is true, this paper asks, how and to what extent do Australian property law curricula embrace the teaching of skills?",
author = "Penny Carruthers and Natalie Skead and Kathrine Galloway",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.5204/qutlr.v12i2.490",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal",
issn = "2201-7275",
publisher = "Queensland University of Technology, Faculty of Law",
number = "2",

}

Teaching, skills and outcomes in Australian property law units : A survey of current approaches. / Carruthers, Penny; Skead, Natalie; Galloway, Kathrine.

In: Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching, skills and outcomes in Australian property law units

T2 - A survey of current approaches

AU - Carruthers, Penny

AU - Skead, Natalie

AU - Galloway, Kathrine

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Globally, higher education and legal education have embraced the development of skills as an integral part of student learning. It is no longer enough that graduates enter the workplace armed only with a body of disembodied discipline knowledge. It is expected that graduates have complementary skills – both generic and professional. These skills do not appear ‘magically’; rather it is the role of the law teacher to facilitate students’ development of these skills during their studies. The imperative to design curricula that embed skills development has become more urgent with the advent of discipline standards and the new quality regime in Australia. This paper reports on a survey of Australian property law teachers undertaken in late 2011. The paper analyses teaching methods, skills and outcomes in the teaching of property law. In particular, the paper considers how property teachers deal with the development of skills in the property law curriculum, testing Gray’s suggestion that ‘[i]t is in Property Law that consciously or unconsciously the student learns a basic competence in a number of skills which are of immense importance in later life.’(1) If this is true, this paper asks, how and to what extent do Australian property law curricula embrace the teaching of skills?

AB - Globally, higher education and legal education have embraced the development of skills as an integral part of student learning. It is no longer enough that graduates enter the workplace armed only with a body of disembodied discipline knowledge. It is expected that graduates have complementary skills – both generic and professional. These skills do not appear ‘magically’; rather it is the role of the law teacher to facilitate students’ development of these skills during their studies. The imperative to design curricula that embed skills development has become more urgent with the advent of discipline standards and the new quality regime in Australia. This paper reports on a survey of Australian property law teachers undertaken in late 2011. The paper analyses teaching methods, skills and outcomes in the teaching of property law. In particular, the paper considers how property teachers deal with the development of skills in the property law curriculum, testing Gray’s suggestion that ‘[i]t is in Property Law that consciously or unconsciously the student learns a basic competence in a number of skills which are of immense importance in later life.’(1) If this is true, this paper asks, how and to what extent do Australian property law curricula embrace the teaching of skills?

U2 - 10.5204/qutlr.v12i2.490

DO - 10.5204/qutlr.v12i2.490

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal

JF - Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal

SN - 2201-7275

IS - 2

ER -