Teaching Public Law in a Comparative Paradigm: Virtues and Vices

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Comparison in legal education matters. In its mission statement, the International Society of Public Law suggests that, “a full explication and understanding of today’s ‘constitutional’ [law] cannot take place in isolation from other branches of public law or in a context that is exclusively national”. Not only is comparative content of itself enlightening, but this paper argues comparison as a teaching method has at least four virtues. First, teaching in a comparative paradigm better prepares graduates for an interconnected and global legal marketplace. Second, it helps illuminate curriculum content. Third, it makes for good citizenry. And, fourth, it enhances the research/teaching nexus. In so doing, this paper explores the use of comparative law as a teaching methodology in core public law subjects rather than by way of additional curriculum content. As with all things, however, where there are virtues, there are also vices. In this context, such vices include questions of relevance and threats to space, time and coherence in legal education. To that end, the disadvantages of comparative approaches in teaching public law are also considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-118
Number of pages17
JournalThe Law Teacher
Volume53
Issue number1
Early online date30 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

public law
paradigm
teaching content
Teaching
constitutional law
teaching research
teaching method
social isolation
education
graduate
threat
Law
methodology

Cite this

@article{0bb6bb8a0b8f46ea99458c92ba4e542e,
title = "Teaching Public Law in a Comparative Paradigm: Virtues and Vices",
abstract = "Comparison in legal education matters. In its mission statement, the International Society of Public Law suggests that, “a full explication and understanding of today’s ‘constitutional’ [law] cannot take place in isolation from other branches of public law or in a context that is exclusively national”. Not only is comparative content of itself enlightening, but this paper argues comparison as a teaching method has at least four virtues. First, teaching in a comparative paradigm better prepares graduates for an interconnected and global legal marketplace. Second, it helps illuminate curriculum content. Third, it makes for good citizenry. And, fourth, it enhances the research/teaching nexus. In so doing, this paper explores the use of comparative law as a teaching methodology in core public law subjects rather than by way of additional curriculum content. As with all things, however, where there are virtues, there are also vices. In this context, such vices include questions of relevance and threats to space, time and coherence in legal education. To that end, the disadvantages of comparative approaches in teaching public law are also considered.",
author = "Danielle Ireland-Piper",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/03069400.2018.1503520",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "102--118",
journal = "Law Teacher",
issn = "0306-9400",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Teaching Public Law in a Comparative Paradigm: Virtues and Vices. / Ireland-Piper, Danielle.

In: The Law Teacher, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2019, p. 102-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching Public Law in a Comparative Paradigm: Virtues and Vices

AU - Ireland-Piper, Danielle

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Comparison in legal education matters. In its mission statement, the International Society of Public Law suggests that, “a full explication and understanding of today’s ‘constitutional’ [law] cannot take place in isolation from other branches of public law or in a context that is exclusively national”. Not only is comparative content of itself enlightening, but this paper argues comparison as a teaching method has at least four virtues. First, teaching in a comparative paradigm better prepares graduates for an interconnected and global legal marketplace. Second, it helps illuminate curriculum content. Third, it makes for good citizenry. And, fourth, it enhances the research/teaching nexus. In so doing, this paper explores the use of comparative law as a teaching methodology in core public law subjects rather than by way of additional curriculum content. As with all things, however, where there are virtues, there are also vices. In this context, such vices include questions of relevance and threats to space, time and coherence in legal education. To that end, the disadvantages of comparative approaches in teaching public law are also considered.

AB - Comparison in legal education matters. In its mission statement, the International Society of Public Law suggests that, “a full explication and understanding of today’s ‘constitutional’ [law] cannot take place in isolation from other branches of public law or in a context that is exclusively national”. Not only is comparative content of itself enlightening, but this paper argues comparison as a teaching method has at least four virtues. First, teaching in a comparative paradigm better prepares graduates for an interconnected and global legal marketplace. Second, it helps illuminate curriculum content. Third, it makes for good citizenry. And, fourth, it enhances the research/teaching nexus. In so doing, this paper explores the use of comparative law as a teaching methodology in core public law subjects rather than by way of additional curriculum content. As with all things, however, where there are virtues, there are also vices. In this context, such vices include questions of relevance and threats to space, time and coherence in legal education. To that end, the disadvantages of comparative approaches in teaching public law are also considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053252742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03069400.2018.1503520

DO - 10.1080/03069400.2018.1503520

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 102

EP - 118

JO - Law Teacher

JF - Law Teacher

SN - 0306-9400

IS - 1

ER -