Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy

Sally Bennett, Tammy Hoffmann, Annie McCluskey, Nicole Coghlan, Leigh Tooth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. We sought to identify and describe the number, topics, and publishing trends of systematic reviews relevant to occupational therapy indexed in the OTseeker database. Method. We performed a cross-sectional survey of the systematic reviews contained in OTseeker in December 2011. Results. Of the 1,940 systematic reviews indexed in OTseeker, only 53 (2.7%) were published in occupational therapy journals. The most common diagnostic categories were stroke (n 5 195, 10.1%) and affective disorders (n 5 204, 10.5%). The most common intervention categories were consumer education (n 5 644, 33.2%) and psychosocial techniques (n 5 571, 29.4%). Only 390 (20.1%) of the 1,940 systematic reviews specifically involved occupational therapy. Conclusion. Occupational therapists need to search broadly to locate relevant systematic reviews or, alternatively, to use databases such as OTseeker. Clarity about the involvement of occupational therapy in reports of future research will improve the ability to identify occupational therapy research for all stakeholders. Finally, occupational therapy practitioners need to read systematic reviews critically to determine whether review conclusions are justified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-354
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Occupational Therapy
Databases
Aptitude
Mood Disorders
Cross-Sectional Studies
Stroke
Education
Research

Cite this

Bennett, Sally ; Hoffmann, Tammy ; McCluskey, Annie ; Coghlan, Nicole ; Tooth, Leigh. / Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy. In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2013 ; Vol. 67, No. 3. pp. 345-354.
@article{a5d24752f86d459f8c631c0704596978,
title = "Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy",
abstract = "Objective. We sought to identify and describe the number, topics, and publishing trends of systematic reviews relevant to occupational therapy indexed in the OTseeker database. Method. We performed a cross-sectional survey of the systematic reviews contained in OTseeker in December 2011. Results. Of the 1,940 systematic reviews indexed in OTseeker, only 53 (2.7{\%}) were published in occupational therapy journals. The most common diagnostic categories were stroke (n 5 195, 10.1{\%}) and affective disorders (n 5 204, 10.5{\%}). The most common intervention categories were consumer education (n 5 644, 33.2{\%}) and psychosocial techniques (n 5 571, 29.4{\%}). Only 390 (20.1{\%}) of the 1,940 systematic reviews specifically involved occupational therapy. Conclusion. Occupational therapists need to search broadly to locate relevant systematic reviews or, alternatively, to use databases such as OTseeker. Clarity about the involvement of occupational therapy in reports of future research will improve the ability to identify occupational therapy research for all stakeholders. Finally, occupational therapy practitioners need to read systematic reviews critically to determine whether review conclusions are justified.",
author = "Sally Bennett and Tammy Hoffmann and Annie McCluskey and Nicole Coghlan and Leigh Tooth",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.5014/ajot.2013.005819",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "345--354",
journal = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0272-9490",
publisher = "AMER OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOC, INC",
number = "3",

}

Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy. / Bennett, Sally; Hoffmann, Tammy; McCluskey, Annie; Coghlan, Nicole; Tooth, Leigh.

In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 67, No. 3, 05.2013, p. 345-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy

AU - Bennett, Sally

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

AU - McCluskey, Annie

AU - Coghlan, Nicole

AU - Tooth, Leigh

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Objective. We sought to identify and describe the number, topics, and publishing trends of systematic reviews relevant to occupational therapy indexed in the OTseeker database. Method. We performed a cross-sectional survey of the systematic reviews contained in OTseeker in December 2011. Results. Of the 1,940 systematic reviews indexed in OTseeker, only 53 (2.7%) were published in occupational therapy journals. The most common diagnostic categories were stroke (n 5 195, 10.1%) and affective disorders (n 5 204, 10.5%). The most common intervention categories were consumer education (n 5 644, 33.2%) and psychosocial techniques (n 5 571, 29.4%). Only 390 (20.1%) of the 1,940 systematic reviews specifically involved occupational therapy. Conclusion. Occupational therapists need to search broadly to locate relevant systematic reviews or, alternatively, to use databases such as OTseeker. Clarity about the involvement of occupational therapy in reports of future research will improve the ability to identify occupational therapy research for all stakeholders. Finally, occupational therapy practitioners need to read systematic reviews critically to determine whether review conclusions are justified.

AB - Objective. We sought to identify and describe the number, topics, and publishing trends of systematic reviews relevant to occupational therapy indexed in the OTseeker database. Method. We performed a cross-sectional survey of the systematic reviews contained in OTseeker in December 2011. Results. Of the 1,940 systematic reviews indexed in OTseeker, only 53 (2.7%) were published in occupational therapy journals. The most common diagnostic categories were stroke (n 5 195, 10.1%) and affective disorders (n 5 204, 10.5%). The most common intervention categories were consumer education (n 5 644, 33.2%) and psychosocial techniques (n 5 571, 29.4%). Only 390 (20.1%) of the 1,940 systematic reviews specifically involved occupational therapy. Conclusion. Occupational therapists need to search broadly to locate relevant systematic reviews or, alternatively, to use databases such as OTseeker. Clarity about the involvement of occupational therapy in reports of future research will improve the ability to identify occupational therapy research for all stakeholders. Finally, occupational therapy practitioners need to read systematic reviews critically to determine whether review conclusions are justified.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877902542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2013.005819

DO - 10.5014/ajot.2013.005819

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 345

EP - 354

JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0272-9490

IS - 3

ER -