Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries

Laura Jolliffe, Natasha A Lannin, Dominique A Cadilhac, Tammy Hoffmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendation statements aimed at optimising care for adults with stroke and other brain injury. The aim of this study was to determine the quality, scope and consistency of CPG recommendations for rehabilitation covering the acquired brain injury populations.

DESIGN: Systematic review.

INTERVENTIONS: Included CPGs contained recommendations for inpatient rehabilitation or community rehabilitation for adults with an acquired brain injury diagnosis (stroke, traumatic or other non-progressive acquired brain impairments). Electronic databases (n=2), guideline organisations (n=4) and websites of professional societies (n=17) were searched up to November 2017. Two independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and textual syntheses were used to appraise and compare recommendations.

RESULTS: From 427 papers screened, 20 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Only three guidelines were rated high (>75%) across all domains of AGREE-II; highest rated domains were 'scope and purpose' (85.1, SD 18.3) and 'clarity' (76.2%, SD 20.5). Recommendations for assessment and for motor therapies were most commonly reported, however, varied in the level of detail across guidelines.

CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation CPGs were consistent in scope, suggesting little difference in rehabilitation approaches between vascular and traumatic brain injury. There was, however, variability in included studies and methodological quality.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016026936.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere018791
Number of pages14
JournalBMJ Open
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Brain Injuries
Rehabilitation
Guidelines
Cerebrovascular Trauma
Stroke
Stroke Rehabilitation
Inpatients
Organizations
Databases
Brain
Population

Cite this

@article{06ced597b06b49249c8eea8cf6e7f3ea,
title = "Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendation statements aimed at optimising care for adults with stroke and other brain injury. The aim of this study was to determine the quality, scope and consistency of CPG recommendations for rehabilitation covering the acquired brain injury populations.DESIGN: Systematic review.INTERVENTIONS: Included CPGs contained recommendations for inpatient rehabilitation or community rehabilitation for adults with an acquired brain injury diagnosis (stroke, traumatic or other non-progressive acquired brain impairments). Electronic databases (n=2), guideline organisations (n=4) and websites of professional societies (n=17) were searched up to November 2017. Two independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and textual syntheses were used to appraise and compare recommendations.RESULTS: From 427 papers screened, 20 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Only three guidelines were rated high (>75{\%}) across all domains of AGREE-II; highest rated domains were 'scope and purpose' (85.1, SD 18.3) and 'clarity' (76.2{\%}, SD 20.5). Recommendations for assessment and for motor therapies were most commonly reported, however, varied in the level of detail across guidelines.CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation CPGs were consistent in scope, suggesting little difference in rehabilitation approaches between vascular and traumatic brain injury. There was, however, variability in included studies and methodological quality.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016026936.",
author = "Laura Jolliffe and Lannin, {Natasha A} and Cadilhac, {Dominique A} and Tammy Hoffmann",
note = "{\circledC} Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries. / Jolliffe, Laura; Lannin, Natasha A; Cadilhac, Dominique A; Hoffmann, Tammy.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 8, No. 2, e018791, 28.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries

AU - Jolliffe, Laura

AU - Lannin, Natasha A

AU - Cadilhac, Dominique A

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

N1 - © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

PY - 2018/2/28

Y1 - 2018/2/28

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendation statements aimed at optimising care for adults with stroke and other brain injury. The aim of this study was to determine the quality, scope and consistency of CPG recommendations for rehabilitation covering the acquired brain injury populations.DESIGN: Systematic review.INTERVENTIONS: Included CPGs contained recommendations for inpatient rehabilitation or community rehabilitation for adults with an acquired brain injury diagnosis (stroke, traumatic or other non-progressive acquired brain impairments). Electronic databases (n=2), guideline organisations (n=4) and websites of professional societies (n=17) were searched up to November 2017. Two independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and textual syntheses were used to appraise and compare recommendations.RESULTS: From 427 papers screened, 20 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Only three guidelines were rated high (>75%) across all domains of AGREE-II; highest rated domains were 'scope and purpose' (85.1, SD 18.3) and 'clarity' (76.2%, SD 20.5). Recommendations for assessment and for motor therapies were most commonly reported, however, varied in the level of detail across guidelines.CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation CPGs were consistent in scope, suggesting little difference in rehabilitation approaches between vascular and traumatic brain injury. There was, however, variability in included studies and methodological quality.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016026936.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendation statements aimed at optimising care for adults with stroke and other brain injury. The aim of this study was to determine the quality, scope and consistency of CPG recommendations for rehabilitation covering the acquired brain injury populations.DESIGN: Systematic review.INTERVENTIONS: Included CPGs contained recommendations for inpatient rehabilitation or community rehabilitation for adults with an acquired brain injury diagnosis (stroke, traumatic or other non-progressive acquired brain impairments). Electronic databases (n=2), guideline organisations (n=4) and websites of professional societies (n=17) were searched up to November 2017. Two independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and textual syntheses were used to appraise and compare recommendations.RESULTS: From 427 papers screened, 20 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Only three guidelines were rated high (>75%) across all domains of AGREE-II; highest rated domains were 'scope and purpose' (85.1, SD 18.3) and 'clarity' (76.2%, SD 20.5). Recommendations for assessment and for motor therapies were most commonly reported, however, varied in the level of detail across guidelines.CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation CPGs were consistent in scope, suggesting little difference in rehabilitation approaches between vascular and traumatic brain injury. There was, however, variability in included studies and methodological quality.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016026936.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053010226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 2

M1 - e018791

ER -