Abstract
To the Editor: In their Controversies article, Ms Brown-Saltzman and colleagues1 described a case in which a family made a surrogate decision about organ donation on behalf of a living donor. Although the authors stated that "we are unaware of a legal precedent applicable to this case," there was in fact a related case in Ohio in 1998.2 The patient had been in a coma for 3 weeks and was registered with the state as an organ donor via his automobile driver's license. The judge ruled that a kidney could be removed and given to the patient's brother, on the rationale that the comatose patient's condition was irreversible, he could still live (comatose) with 1 kidney, and there was prior evidence that the patient wanted to be an organ donor.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2077-2078 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Journal of the American Medical Association |
Volume | 291 |
Issue number | 17 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 5 May 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |