Suppression orders: Reskilling journalists and the judiciary

Mark Pearson, Caroline Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Journalists, media organisations and industry bodies have long complained about the number of suppression orders issued in Australia each year and the inconsistency of approaches across the nation's nine jurisdictions. State and federal governments have recently taken steps towards developing a national notification system for repression orders, which would at least improve communication to media organisations about the order. Yet important problems still remain for journalists trying to cover court cases, including the widely varied approaches of judicial officers, financial constraints on media organisations which have previously appealed such orders and the inexperience of journalists with the process of objecting to such orders in the court room. This article reviews the law and practice in the area and suggests a strategy of education for both journalists and the judiciary.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0810-2686
Pages (from-to)97-114
Number of pages18
JournalAustralian Journalism Review
Volume32
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

judiciary
suppression
journalist
repression
Federal Government
jurisdiction
Law
industry
communication
education

Cite this

@article{d196d52b0f0c42f19da094ecbe9c4351,
title = "Suppression orders: Reskilling journalists and the judiciary",
abstract = "Journalists, media organisations and industry bodies have long complained about the number of suppression orders issued in Australia each year and the inconsistency of approaches across the nation's nine jurisdictions. State and federal governments have recently taken steps towards developing a national notification system for repression orders, which would at least improve communication to media organisations about the order. Yet important problems still remain for journalists trying to cover court cases, including the widely varied approaches of judicial officers, financial constraints on media organisations which have previously appealed such orders and the inexperience of journalists with the process of objecting to such orders in the court room. This article reviews the law and practice in the area and suggests a strategy of education for both journalists and the judiciary.",
author = "Mark Pearson and Caroline Graham",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "97--114",
journal = "Australian Journalism Review",
issn = "0810-2686",
number = "1",

}

Suppression orders : Reskilling journalists and the judiciary. / Pearson, Mark; Graham, Caroline.

In: Australian Journalism Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 0810-2686, 2010, p. 97-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suppression orders

T2 - Reskilling journalists and the judiciary

AU - Pearson, Mark

AU - Graham, Caroline

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Journalists, media organisations and industry bodies have long complained about the number of suppression orders issued in Australia each year and the inconsistency of approaches across the nation's nine jurisdictions. State and federal governments have recently taken steps towards developing a national notification system for repression orders, which would at least improve communication to media organisations about the order. Yet important problems still remain for journalists trying to cover court cases, including the widely varied approaches of judicial officers, financial constraints on media organisations which have previously appealed such orders and the inexperience of journalists with the process of objecting to such orders in the court room. This article reviews the law and practice in the area and suggests a strategy of education for both journalists and the judiciary.

AB - Journalists, media organisations and industry bodies have long complained about the number of suppression orders issued in Australia each year and the inconsistency of approaches across the nation's nine jurisdictions. State and federal governments have recently taken steps towards developing a national notification system for repression orders, which would at least improve communication to media organisations about the order. Yet important problems still remain for journalists trying to cover court cases, including the widely varied approaches of judicial officers, financial constraints on media organisations which have previously appealed such orders and the inexperience of journalists with the process of objecting to such orders in the court room. This article reviews the law and practice in the area and suggests a strategy of education for both journalists and the judiciary.

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 97

EP - 114

JO - Australian Journalism Review

JF - Australian Journalism Review

SN - 0810-2686

IS - 1

M1 - 0810-2686

ER -