Suppression orders: Reskilling journalists and the judiciary

Mark Pearson, Caroline Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Journalists, media organisations and industry bodies have long complained about the number of suppression orders issued in Australia each year and the inconsistency of approaches across the nation's nine jurisdictions. State and federal governments have recently taken steps towards developing a national notification system for repression orders, which would at least improve communication to media organisations about the order. Yet important problems still remain for journalists trying to cover court cases, including the widely varied approaches of judicial officers, financial constraints on media organisations which have previously appealed such orders and the inexperience of journalists with the process of objecting to such orders in the court room. This article reviews the law and practice in the area and suggests a strategy of education for both journalists and the judiciary.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0810-2686
Pages (from-to)97-114
Number of pages18
JournalAustralian Journalism Review
Volume32
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Suppression orders: Reskilling journalists and the judiciary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this