Abstract
Summary of major points
1. A multidimensional approach to vexatious litigants that focuses on earlier intervention
with more graduated responses is the best approach to manage vexatious behaviour
and reduce negative impacts.
2. The bar should be lowered in terms of the type of behaviour that attracts a response
from the justice system, but without the imposition of severe, general litigationrestricting
consequences.
3. Following the experience in Queensland, advantages to a publicly available and
searchable register of orders against vexatious litigants outweigh the disadvantages
(which with appropriate care can be managed).
1. A multidimensional approach to vexatious litigants that focuses on earlier intervention
with more graduated responses is the best approach to manage vexatious behaviour
and reduce negative impacts.
2. The bar should be lowered in terms of the type of behaviour that attracts a response
from the justice system, but without the imposition of severe, general litigationrestricting
consequences.
3. Following the experience in Queensland, advantages to a publicly available and
searchable register of orders against vexatious litigants outweigh the disadvantages
(which with appropriate care can be managed).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Type | submission |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Submission to the Australian Productivity Commission in relation to the Draft Report on Access to Justice Arrangements: Post-draft submission number DR328'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver