Student perspective on electronic evaluation of teaching

Shelley Kinash, Diana Knight, Lauren Hives

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Research indicates that administering university student evaluation of teaching electronically rather than via paper-based surveys increases the quality and timeliness of the feedback thereby making a stronger contribution to teaching and learning enhancement. The documented
    drawback of electronic student evaluation is the response rate, which is significantly lower than paper-based surveys. This study documents a pilot project whereby electronic student evaluation of teaching was administered for one semester in units of study in three of four of the
    University’s faculties. The outcomes confirmed similar studies’ results. Whereas most studies are written from the academic and/or administrator point of view, the unique contribution of this study, coauthored by a graduate student, is that students were asked to evaluate
    the evaluation through an online forum, focus groups, and through the
    student association. The feedback conveyed a clear and consistent message that students prefer electronic student evaluation of teaching because of enhanced anonymity and convenience and less time pressure.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)86-97
    Number of pages12
    JournalStudies in Learning Evaluation Innovation and Development
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    electronics
    Teaching
    evaluation
    student
    anonymity
    pilot project
    semester
    graduate
    university
    learning
    Group

    Cite this

    Kinash, Shelley ; Knight, Diana ; Hives, Lauren. / Student perspective on electronic evaluation of teaching. In: Studies in Learning Evaluation Innovation and Development. 2011 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 86-97.
    @article{6e72f1ca29a6456289661fcc197c4c4e,
    title = "Student perspective on electronic evaluation of teaching",
    abstract = "Research indicates that administering university student evaluation of teaching electronically rather than via paper-based surveys increases the quality and timeliness of the feedback thereby making a stronger contribution to teaching and learning enhancement. The documenteddrawback of electronic student evaluation is the response rate, which is significantly lower than paper-based surveys. This study documents a pilot project whereby electronic student evaluation of teaching was administered for one semester in units of study in three of four of theUniversity’s faculties. The outcomes confirmed similar studies’ results. Whereas most studies are written from the academic and/or administrator point of view, the unique contribution of this study, coauthored by a graduate student, is that students were asked to evaluatethe evaluation through an online forum, focus groups, and through thestudent association. The feedback conveyed a clear and consistent message that students prefer electronic student evaluation of teaching because of enhanced anonymity and convenience and less time pressure.",
    author = "Shelley Kinash and Diana Knight and Lauren Hives",
    note = "{\circledC} Copyright of articles is retained by authors. As an open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. ISSN 1832-2050",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "86--97",
    journal = "Studies in Learning Evaluation Innovation and Development",
    issn = "1832-2050",
    number = "1",

    }

    Student perspective on electronic evaluation of teaching. / Kinash, Shelley; Knight, Diana; Hives, Lauren.

    In: Studies in Learning Evaluation Innovation and Development, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2011, p. 86-97.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Student perspective on electronic evaluation of teaching

    AU - Kinash, Shelley

    AU - Knight, Diana

    AU - Hives, Lauren

    N1 - © Copyright of articles is retained by authors. As an open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. ISSN 1832-2050

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Research indicates that administering university student evaluation of teaching electronically rather than via paper-based surveys increases the quality and timeliness of the feedback thereby making a stronger contribution to teaching and learning enhancement. The documenteddrawback of electronic student evaluation is the response rate, which is significantly lower than paper-based surveys. This study documents a pilot project whereby electronic student evaluation of teaching was administered for one semester in units of study in three of four of theUniversity’s faculties. The outcomes confirmed similar studies’ results. Whereas most studies are written from the academic and/or administrator point of view, the unique contribution of this study, coauthored by a graduate student, is that students were asked to evaluatethe evaluation through an online forum, focus groups, and through thestudent association. The feedback conveyed a clear and consistent message that students prefer electronic student evaluation of teaching because of enhanced anonymity and convenience and less time pressure.

    AB - Research indicates that administering university student evaluation of teaching electronically rather than via paper-based surveys increases the quality and timeliness of the feedback thereby making a stronger contribution to teaching and learning enhancement. The documenteddrawback of electronic student evaluation is the response rate, which is significantly lower than paper-based surveys. This study documents a pilot project whereby electronic student evaluation of teaching was administered for one semester in units of study in three of four of theUniversity’s faculties. The outcomes confirmed similar studies’ results. Whereas most studies are written from the academic and/or administrator point of view, the unique contribution of this study, coauthored by a graduate student, is that students were asked to evaluatethe evaluation through an online forum, focus groups, and through thestudent association. The feedback conveyed a clear and consistent message that students prefer electronic student evaluation of teaching because of enhanced anonymity and convenience and less time pressure.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 86

    EP - 97

    JO - Studies in Learning Evaluation Innovation and Development

    JF - Studies in Learning Evaluation Innovation and Development

    SN - 1832-2050

    IS - 1

    ER -