Structural advantages for ant colony optimisation inherent in permutation scheduling problems

James Montgomery, M Randall, T Hendtlass

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
210 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When using a constructive search algorithm, solutions to scheduling problems such as the job shop and open shop scheduling problems are typically represented as permutations of the operations to be scheduled. The combination of this representation and the use of a constructive algorithm introduces a bias typically favouring good solutions. When ant colony optimisation is applied to these problems, a number of alternative pheromone representations are available, each of which interacts with this underlying bias in different ways. This paper explores both the structural aspects of the problem that introduce this underlying bias and the ways two pheromone representations may either lead towards poorer or better solutions over time. Thus it is a synthesis of a number of recent studies in this area that deal with each of these aspects independently.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInnovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence
EditorsM Ali, F Esposito
PublisherSpringer
Pages218-228
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)3-540-26551-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Event18th International Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems - Bari, Italy
Duration: 22 Jun 200524 Jun 2005
Conference number: 18

Publication series

NameLECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
PublisherSPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN
Volume3533
ISSN (Print)0302-9743

Conference

Conference18th International Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems
Abbreviated title IEA/AIE
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityBari
Period22/06/0524/06/05

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structural advantages for ant colony optimisation inherent in permutation scheduling problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this