Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure: Understanding success and failure

Gary Bowman, R. Bradley MacKay, Swapnesh Masrani, Peter McKiernan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scenario planning has become a widely used strategic management approach for understanding future environmental uncertainty. Despite its increasing popularity in management practice, the theoretical underpinnings for scenario planning processes remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, there is little analysis on why some scenario methods succeed and others fail. To address this gap, we draw on storytelling theory as a conceptual lens for analyzing our data. This paper uses a longitudinal case study of two successive scenario planning interventions over a nine-year period in an intra-organizational partnership to investigate the efficacy of scenario planning development processes. Of the two interventions, the first, which followed what we term an 'inductive' method, was successful, meeting the objectives set by the organization, while the second approach, which we term 'deductive', was deemed a failure. We develop a process model explaining these divergent outcomes based on how meaning was either enabled or inhibited in the two methods through storytelling.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)735-748
Number of pages14
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume80
Issue number2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Planning
Practice Management
Lenses
Uncertainty
Longitudinal Studies
Scenarios
Storytelling
Scenario planning
Management practices
Development process
Process model
Environmental uncertainty
Strategic management
Efficacy
Longitudinal case study
Scenario method
Planning process

Cite this

Bowman, Gary ; MacKay, R. Bradley ; Masrani, Swapnesh ; McKiernan, Peter. / Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure : Understanding success and failure. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2013 ; Vol. 80, No. 2013. pp. 735-748.
@article{108c2e2a8fae4c6692827287489cbed7,
title = "Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure: Understanding success and failure",
abstract = "Scenario planning has become a widely used strategic management approach for understanding future environmental uncertainty. Despite its increasing popularity in management practice, the theoretical underpinnings for scenario planning processes remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, there is little analysis on why some scenario methods succeed and others fail. To address this gap, we draw on storytelling theory as a conceptual lens for analyzing our data. This paper uses a longitudinal case study of two successive scenario planning interventions over a nine-year period in an intra-organizational partnership to investigate the efficacy of scenario planning development processes. Of the two interventions, the first, which followed what we term an 'inductive' method, was successful, meeting the objectives set by the organization, while the second approach, which we term 'deductive', was deemed a failure. We develop a process model explaining these divergent outcomes based on how meaning was either enabled or inhibited in the two methods through storytelling.",
author = "Gary Bowman and MacKay, {R. Bradley} and Swapnesh Masrani and Peter McKiernan",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.009",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "735--748",
journal = "Technological Forecasting",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2013",

}

Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure : Understanding success and failure. / Bowman, Gary; MacKay, R. Bradley; Masrani, Swapnesh; McKiernan, Peter.

In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 80, No. 2013, 2013, p. 735-748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure

T2 - Understanding success and failure

AU - Bowman, Gary

AU - MacKay, R. Bradley

AU - Masrani, Swapnesh

AU - McKiernan, Peter

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Scenario planning has become a widely used strategic management approach for understanding future environmental uncertainty. Despite its increasing popularity in management practice, the theoretical underpinnings for scenario planning processes remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, there is little analysis on why some scenario methods succeed and others fail. To address this gap, we draw on storytelling theory as a conceptual lens for analyzing our data. This paper uses a longitudinal case study of two successive scenario planning interventions over a nine-year period in an intra-organizational partnership to investigate the efficacy of scenario planning development processes. Of the two interventions, the first, which followed what we term an 'inductive' method, was successful, meeting the objectives set by the organization, while the second approach, which we term 'deductive', was deemed a failure. We develop a process model explaining these divergent outcomes based on how meaning was either enabled or inhibited in the two methods through storytelling.

AB - Scenario planning has become a widely used strategic management approach for understanding future environmental uncertainty. Despite its increasing popularity in management practice, the theoretical underpinnings for scenario planning processes remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, there is little analysis on why some scenario methods succeed and others fail. To address this gap, we draw on storytelling theory as a conceptual lens for analyzing our data. This paper uses a longitudinal case study of two successive scenario planning interventions over a nine-year period in an intra-organizational partnership to investigate the efficacy of scenario planning development processes. Of the two interventions, the first, which followed what we term an 'inductive' method, was successful, meeting the objectives set by the organization, while the second approach, which we term 'deductive', was deemed a failure. We develop a process model explaining these divergent outcomes based on how meaning was either enabled or inhibited in the two methods through storytelling.

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.009

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 735

EP - 748

JO - Technological Forecasting

JF - Technological Forecasting

SN - 0040-1625

IS - 2013

ER -