TY - JOUR
T1 - Stigma, homosexuality and the homosexual advance defence
AU - Gray, Anthony
AU - Braun, Kerstin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Thomson Head Office.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This article considers developments in the law regarding homosexuality through the prism of stigma, which retains an important role in psychology theory. It explores the role of law in perpetuating, or tackling, stigma. While the decriminalisation of homosexual practice between consenting adults has been important in reducing the stigma attached to homosexual activity, it is evident that stigma, and its associated serious psychological effects, persists in relation to sexuality. The recent High Court of Australia decision permitting a "homosexual advance defence" to be used by an offender accused of murdering the person making the unwanted advance is argued to reflect and perpetuate the continued stigmatisation of homosexual practice. There is reason to doubt whether the High Court would view an unwanted heterosexual advance in the same way as it apparently views an unwanted homosexual advance. The law must be careful in apparently excusing, or partly excusing, extremely violent (sometimes deadly) behaviour, and the message it sends when it does so.
AB - This article considers developments in the law regarding homosexuality through the prism of stigma, which retains an important role in psychology theory. It explores the role of law in perpetuating, or tackling, stigma. While the decriminalisation of homosexual practice between consenting adults has been important in reducing the stigma attached to homosexual activity, it is evident that stigma, and its associated serious psychological effects, persists in relation to sexuality. The recent High Court of Australia decision permitting a "homosexual advance defence" to be used by an offender accused of murdering the person making the unwanted advance is argued to reflect and perpetuate the continued stigmatisation of homosexual practice. There is reason to doubt whether the High Court would view an unwanted heterosexual advance in the same way as it apparently views an unwanted homosexual advance. The law must be careful in apparently excusing, or partly excusing, extremely violent (sometimes deadly) behaviour, and the message it sends when it does so.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062534100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85062534100
SN - 1320-159X
VL - 24
SP - 935
EP - 958
JO - Journal of Law and Medicine
JF - Journal of Law and Medicine
IS - 4
ER -