Standard of Proof, Unpredictable Behaviour and the High Court of Australia's Verdict on Preventive Detention Laws

Anthony Gray

Standard of Proof, Unpredictable Behaviour and the High Court of Australia's Verdict on Preventive Detention Laws

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

This paper considers the Fardon decision, which validated preventive detention legislation against constitutional challenge. Though there were differences between the legislation considered there and that invalidated in the Kable, the article suggests these were not significant enough to justify a different outcome.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	177-207
Number of pages	32
Journal	Deakin Law Review
Volume	10
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - 2005
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/DeakinLawRw/2005/9.htmlLicence: Free to read

Cite this

@article{83ca00cf1ff3476f874ed0790149e360,

title = "Standard of Proof, Unpredictable Behaviour and the High Court of Australia's Verdict on Preventive Detention Laws",

abstract = "This paper considers the Fardon decision, which validated preventive detention legislation against constitutional challenge. Though there were differences between the legislation considered there and that invalidated in the Kable, the article suggests these were not significant enough to justify a different outcome.",

author = "Anthony Gray",

year = "2005",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "177--207",

journal = "Deakin Law Review",

issn = "1321-3660",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standard of Proof, Unpredictable Behaviour and the High Court of Australia's Verdict on Preventive Detention Laws

AU - Gray, Anthony

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This paper considers the Fardon decision, which validated preventive detention legislation against constitutional challenge. Though there were differences between the legislation considered there and that invalidated in the Kable, the article suggests these were not significant enough to justify a different outcome.

AB - This paper considers the Fardon decision, which validated preventive detention legislation against constitutional challenge. Though there were differences between the legislation considered there and that invalidated in the Kable, the article suggests these were not significant enough to justify a different outcome.

M3 - Article

SN - 1321-3660

VL - 10

SP - 177

EP - 207

JO - Deakin Law Review

JF - Deakin Law Review

IS - 1

ER -

Standard of Proof, Unpredictable Behaviour and the High Court of Australia's Verdict on Preventive Detention Laws

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this