Stakeholder engagement in water policy: Lessons from peri-urban irrigation

Shelley Burgin, Tony Webb, Debbie Rae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In highly urbanised Australia many cities and towns demand may have exceeded existing water supply. In peri-urban areas this can lead to conflict over access to supplies with priority often given to urban users. In an effort to resolve potential conflicts, water management planning often seeks to engage 'community stakeholders' in an attempt to produce a 'harmonised' strategic plan. In this paper we focus on the process of developing one such plan for sustainable water management in a peri-urban area with complex and conflicting stakeholder interests. We subject data from a series of planning meetings and 'stakeholder' workshops to a critical review and analysis against the project's stated aims for this stage of the process of: engaging key stakeholders, developing a common vision, and deciding research priorities. We conclude that the approach was unable to achieve these strategic outcomes. In discussion we explore how this analysis reflects barriers in the engagement process, which highlight more general concerns about this widely accepted model for stakeholder engagement in resource issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)650-659
Number of pages10
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

water policy
irrigation
stakeholders
stakeholder
water
water management
periurban area
urban areas
urban area
planning
conflict potential
management planning
towns
water supply
town
policy
demand
resource
resources
community

Cite this

Burgin, Shelley ; Webb, Tony ; Rae, Debbie. / Stakeholder engagement in water policy : Lessons from peri-urban irrigation. In: Land Use Policy. 2013 ; Vol. 31. pp. 650-659.
@article{97fa40c759ac400284833019643295a0,
title = "Stakeholder engagement in water policy: Lessons from peri-urban irrigation",
abstract = "In highly urbanised Australia many cities and towns demand may have exceeded existing water supply. In peri-urban areas this can lead to conflict over access to supplies with priority often given to urban users. In an effort to resolve potential conflicts, water management planning often seeks to engage 'community stakeholders' in an attempt to produce a 'harmonised' strategic plan. In this paper we focus on the process of developing one such plan for sustainable water management in a peri-urban area with complex and conflicting stakeholder interests. We subject data from a series of planning meetings and 'stakeholder' workshops to a critical review and analysis against the project's stated aims for this stage of the process of: engaging key stakeholders, developing a common vision, and deciding research priorities. We conclude that the approach was unable to achieve these strategic outcomes. In discussion we explore how this analysis reflects barriers in the engagement process, which highlight more general concerns about this widely accepted model for stakeholder engagement in resource issues.",
author = "Shelley Burgin and Tony Webb and Debbie Rae",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.010",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "650--659",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Stakeholder engagement in water policy : Lessons from peri-urban irrigation. / Burgin, Shelley; Webb, Tony; Rae, Debbie.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 31, 03.2013, p. 650-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder engagement in water policy

T2 - Lessons from peri-urban irrigation

AU - Burgin, Shelley

AU - Webb, Tony

AU - Rae, Debbie

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - In highly urbanised Australia many cities and towns demand may have exceeded existing water supply. In peri-urban areas this can lead to conflict over access to supplies with priority often given to urban users. In an effort to resolve potential conflicts, water management planning often seeks to engage 'community stakeholders' in an attempt to produce a 'harmonised' strategic plan. In this paper we focus on the process of developing one such plan for sustainable water management in a peri-urban area with complex and conflicting stakeholder interests. We subject data from a series of planning meetings and 'stakeholder' workshops to a critical review and analysis against the project's stated aims for this stage of the process of: engaging key stakeholders, developing a common vision, and deciding research priorities. We conclude that the approach was unable to achieve these strategic outcomes. In discussion we explore how this analysis reflects barriers in the engagement process, which highlight more general concerns about this widely accepted model for stakeholder engagement in resource issues.

AB - In highly urbanised Australia many cities and towns demand may have exceeded existing water supply. In peri-urban areas this can lead to conflict over access to supplies with priority often given to urban users. In an effort to resolve potential conflicts, water management planning often seeks to engage 'community stakeholders' in an attempt to produce a 'harmonised' strategic plan. In this paper we focus on the process of developing one such plan for sustainable water management in a peri-urban area with complex and conflicting stakeholder interests. We subject data from a series of planning meetings and 'stakeholder' workshops to a critical review and analysis against the project's stated aims for this stage of the process of: engaging key stakeholders, developing a common vision, and deciding research priorities. We conclude that the approach was unable to achieve these strategic outcomes. In discussion we explore how this analysis reflects barriers in the engagement process, which highlight more general concerns about this widely accepted model for stakeholder engagement in resource issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871769135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.010

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 650

EP - 659

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -