Sports diplomacy in the Australian context: A case study of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For a county with a small population, a remote location and an awkward colonial past, Australia has a remarkable record of success in international sport, so much so that sport is often considered a ‘religion’ in the ‘Lucky Country’. If diplomacy is the business of representation, it would be expected that sport features prominently in Australia’s diplomacy. However, sport oddly languishes under the banner of Public Diplomacy (PD) and is overseen by an unloved, under-resourced and under-represented Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). To exploit the type of vertical, horizontal and plural channels and networks diplomacy can offer in the 21st century, DFAT must remove sport from under the PD banner. Sports diplomacy must be funded by DFAT appropriately and developed to truly represent the place of sport in Australia’s history, culture and society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalSports Law eJournal
Volume18
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

diplomacy
Sports
Religion
history

Cite this

@article{0d5c20486b044709af00a0858993d3c8,
title = "Sports diplomacy in the Australian context: A case study of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
abstract = "For a county with a small population, a remote location and an awkward colonial past, Australia has a remarkable record of success in international sport, so much so that sport is often considered a ‘religion’ in the ‘Lucky Country’. If diplomacy is the business of representation, it would be expected that sport features prominently in Australia’s diplomacy. However, sport oddly languishes under the banner of Public Diplomacy (PD) and is overseen by an unloved, under-resourced and under-represented Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). To exploit the type of vertical, horizontal and plural channels and networks diplomacy can offer in the 21st century, DFAT must remove sport from under the PD banner. Sports diplomacy must be funded by DFAT appropriately and developed to truly represent the place of sport in Australia’s history, culture and society.",
author = "Stuart Murray",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Sports Law eJournal",
issn = "1836-1129",
publisher = "Bond University Press",

}

Sports diplomacy in the Australian context : A case study of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. / Murray, Stuart.

In: Sports Law eJournal, Vol. 18, 2013, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sports diplomacy in the Australian context

T2 - A case study of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

AU - Murray, Stuart

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - For a county with a small population, a remote location and an awkward colonial past, Australia has a remarkable record of success in international sport, so much so that sport is often considered a ‘religion’ in the ‘Lucky Country’. If diplomacy is the business of representation, it would be expected that sport features prominently in Australia’s diplomacy. However, sport oddly languishes under the banner of Public Diplomacy (PD) and is overseen by an unloved, under-resourced and under-represented Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). To exploit the type of vertical, horizontal and plural channels and networks diplomacy can offer in the 21st century, DFAT must remove sport from under the PD banner. Sports diplomacy must be funded by DFAT appropriately and developed to truly represent the place of sport in Australia’s history, culture and society.

AB - For a county with a small population, a remote location and an awkward colonial past, Australia has a remarkable record of success in international sport, so much so that sport is often considered a ‘religion’ in the ‘Lucky Country’. If diplomacy is the business of representation, it would be expected that sport features prominently in Australia’s diplomacy. However, sport oddly languishes under the banner of Public Diplomacy (PD) and is overseen by an unloved, under-resourced and under-represented Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). To exploit the type of vertical, horizontal and plural channels and networks diplomacy can offer in the 21st century, DFAT must remove sport from under the PD banner. Sports diplomacy must be funded by DFAT appropriately and developed to truly represent the place of sport in Australia’s history, culture and society.

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Sports Law eJournal

JF - Sports Law eJournal

SN - 1836-1129

ER -