Spinal manipulation epidemiology: Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies

Z. A. Michaleff, C. W.C. Lin, C. G. Maher, M. W. van Tulder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is frequently used by health professionals to manage spinal pain. With many treatments having comparable outcomes to SMT, determining the cost-effectiveness of these treatments has been identified as a high research priority. Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of SMT compared to other treatment options for people with spinal pain of any duration. Methods: We searched eight clinical and economic databases and the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Full economic evaluations conducted alongside randomised controlled trials with at least one SMT arm were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the CHEC-list. Results: Six cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis were included. All included studies had a low risk of bias scoring 16/19 on the CHEC-List. SMT was found to be a cost-effective treatment to manage neck and back pain when used alone or in combination with other techniques compared to GP care, exercise and physiotherapy. Conclusions: This review supports the use of SMT in clinical practice as a cost-effective treatment when used alone or in combination with other treatment approaches. However, as this conclusion is primarily based on single studies more high quality research is needed to identify whether these findings are applicable in other settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-662
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Manipulation
Musculoskeletal Manipulations
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Epidemiology
Health Care Costs
Pain
Neck Pain
Therapeutics
Back Pain
Research
Randomized Controlled Trials
Economics
Databases
Health

Cite this

Michaleff, Z. A. ; Lin, C. W.C. ; Maher, C. G. ; van Tulder, M. W. / Spinal manipulation epidemiology : Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies. In: Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 655-662.
@article{5a8df5528b4c48f286e3b7128a34aaec,
title = "Spinal manipulation epidemiology: Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies",
abstract = "Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is frequently used by health professionals to manage spinal pain. With many treatments having comparable outcomes to SMT, determining the cost-effectiveness of these treatments has been identified as a high research priority. Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of SMT compared to other treatment options for people with spinal pain of any duration. Methods: We searched eight clinical and economic databases and the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Full economic evaluations conducted alongside randomised controlled trials with at least one SMT arm were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the CHEC-list. Results: Six cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis were included. All included studies had a low risk of bias scoring 16/19 on the CHEC-List. SMT was found to be a cost-effective treatment to manage neck and back pain when used alone or in combination with other techniques compared to GP care, exercise and physiotherapy. Conclusions: This review supports the use of SMT in clinical practice as a cost-effective treatment when used alone or in combination with other treatment approaches. However, as this conclusion is primarily based on single studies more high quality research is needed to identify whether these findings are applicable in other settings.",
author = "Michaleff, {Z. A.} and Lin, {C. W.C.} and Maher, {C. G.} and {van Tulder}, {M. W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.011",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "655--662",
journal = "Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology",
issn = "1050-6411",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Spinal manipulation epidemiology : Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies. / Michaleff, Z. A.; Lin, C. W.C.; Maher, C. G.; van Tulder, M. W.

In: Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 22, No. 5, 01.10.2012, p. 655-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinal manipulation epidemiology

T2 - Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies

AU - Michaleff, Z. A.

AU - Lin, C. W.C.

AU - Maher, C. G.

AU - van Tulder, M. W.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is frequently used by health professionals to manage spinal pain. With many treatments having comparable outcomes to SMT, determining the cost-effectiveness of these treatments has been identified as a high research priority. Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of SMT compared to other treatment options for people with spinal pain of any duration. Methods: We searched eight clinical and economic databases and the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Full economic evaluations conducted alongside randomised controlled trials with at least one SMT arm were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the CHEC-list. Results: Six cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis were included. All included studies had a low risk of bias scoring 16/19 on the CHEC-List. SMT was found to be a cost-effective treatment to manage neck and back pain when used alone or in combination with other techniques compared to GP care, exercise and physiotherapy. Conclusions: This review supports the use of SMT in clinical practice as a cost-effective treatment when used alone or in combination with other treatment approaches. However, as this conclusion is primarily based on single studies more high quality research is needed to identify whether these findings are applicable in other settings.

AB - Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is frequently used by health professionals to manage spinal pain. With many treatments having comparable outcomes to SMT, determining the cost-effectiveness of these treatments has been identified as a high research priority. Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of SMT compared to other treatment options for people with spinal pain of any duration. Methods: We searched eight clinical and economic databases and the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Full economic evaluations conducted alongside randomised controlled trials with at least one SMT arm were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the CHEC-list. Results: Six cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis were included. All included studies had a low risk of bias scoring 16/19 on the CHEC-List. SMT was found to be a cost-effective treatment to manage neck and back pain when used alone or in combination with other techniques compared to GP care, exercise and physiotherapy. Conclusions: This review supports the use of SMT in clinical practice as a cost-effective treatment when used alone or in combination with other treatment approaches. However, as this conclusion is primarily based on single studies more high quality research is needed to identify whether these findings are applicable in other settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866749150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.011

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 655

EP - 662

JO - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

JF - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

SN - 1050-6411

IS - 5

ER -