Spatial summation of pain in humans investigated using transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Emily Reid, Daniel Harvie, Rohan Miegel, Charles Spence, G Lorimer Moseley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial summation of pain is well accepted but surprisingly understudied. Area-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the area of stimulation. Distance-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the distance between multiple stimuli. Although transcutaneous electrical stimulation has several advantages over other experimental pain paradigms, whether or not this modality evokes spatial summation remains unknown. We aimed to answer this question in order to lay the foundation for critical studies of spatial summation. Twenty-five healthy participants received stimuli on their forearm, and the primary outcome, pain intensity, was compared across 5 spatial configurations-1 with a single stimulus and 4 paired configurations at 0-, 5-, 10-, and 20-cm separations. Importantly, the potential confounder of a proximal-distal gradient in nociceptive sensitivity was removed in this study. Pain intensity was higher in response to the paired stimuli than in response to the single stimulus (P < .001), and the paired stimuli separated by 5, 10 and 20 cm, evoked greater pain than stimuli at a separation of 0 cm (P < .001), thus confirming both area- and distance-based summation, respectively. We conclude that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is appropriate for future investigations of spatial summation.

PERSPECTIVE: Distance-based summation is likely implicated in some clinical pain. However, current understanding for spatial summation is limited. This study demonstrates that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is safe, feasible, and valid for future investigations of spatial summation and will allow critical questions to be answered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-18
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Pain
Forearm
Healthy Volunteers

Cite this

Reid, Emily ; Harvie, Daniel ; Miegel, Rohan ; Spence, Charles ; Moseley, G Lorimer. / Spatial summation of pain in humans investigated using transcutaneous electrical stimulation. In: Journal of Pain. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 11-18.
@article{686825fd4a8f4781b1a0ec61e1326c5a,
title = "Spatial summation of pain in humans investigated using transcutaneous electrical stimulation",
abstract = "Spatial summation of pain is well accepted but surprisingly understudied. Area-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the area of stimulation. Distance-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the distance between multiple stimuli. Although transcutaneous electrical stimulation has several advantages over other experimental pain paradigms, whether or not this modality evokes spatial summation remains unknown. We aimed to answer this question in order to lay the foundation for critical studies of spatial summation. Twenty-five healthy participants received stimuli on their forearm, and the primary outcome, pain intensity, was compared across 5 spatial configurations-1 with a single stimulus and 4 paired configurations at 0-, 5-, 10-, and 20-cm separations. Importantly, the potential confounder of a proximal-distal gradient in nociceptive sensitivity was removed in this study. Pain intensity was higher in response to the paired stimuli than in response to the single stimulus (P < .001), and the paired stimuli separated by 5, 10 and 20 cm, evoked greater pain than stimuli at a separation of 0 cm (P < .001), thus confirming both area- and distance-based summation, respectively. We conclude that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is appropriate for future investigations of spatial summation.PERSPECTIVE: Distance-based summation is likely implicated in some clinical pain. However, current understanding for spatial summation is limited. This study demonstrates that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is safe, feasible, and valid for future investigations of spatial summation and will allow critical questions to be answered.",
author = "Emily Reid and Daniel Harvie and Rohan Miegel and Charles Spence and Moseley, {G Lorimer}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2014.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "11--18",
journal = "Pain Forum",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

Spatial summation of pain in humans investigated using transcutaneous electrical stimulation. / Reid, Emily; Harvie, Daniel; Miegel, Rohan; Spence, Charles; Moseley, G Lorimer.

In: Journal of Pain, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2015, p. 11-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial summation of pain in humans investigated using transcutaneous electrical stimulation

AU - Reid, Emily

AU - Harvie, Daniel

AU - Miegel, Rohan

AU - Spence, Charles

AU - Moseley, G Lorimer

N1 - Copyright © 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Spatial summation of pain is well accepted but surprisingly understudied. Area-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the area of stimulation. Distance-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the distance between multiple stimuli. Although transcutaneous electrical stimulation has several advantages over other experimental pain paradigms, whether or not this modality evokes spatial summation remains unknown. We aimed to answer this question in order to lay the foundation for critical studies of spatial summation. Twenty-five healthy participants received stimuli on their forearm, and the primary outcome, pain intensity, was compared across 5 spatial configurations-1 with a single stimulus and 4 paired configurations at 0-, 5-, 10-, and 20-cm separations. Importantly, the potential confounder of a proximal-distal gradient in nociceptive sensitivity was removed in this study. Pain intensity was higher in response to the paired stimuli than in response to the single stimulus (P < .001), and the paired stimuli separated by 5, 10 and 20 cm, evoked greater pain than stimuli at a separation of 0 cm (P < .001), thus confirming both area- and distance-based summation, respectively. We conclude that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is appropriate for future investigations of spatial summation.PERSPECTIVE: Distance-based summation is likely implicated in some clinical pain. However, current understanding for spatial summation is limited. This study demonstrates that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is safe, feasible, and valid for future investigations of spatial summation and will allow critical questions to be answered.

AB - Spatial summation of pain is well accepted but surprisingly understudied. Area-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the area of stimulation. Distance-based summation refers to the increase in pain evoked by increasing the distance between multiple stimuli. Although transcutaneous electrical stimulation has several advantages over other experimental pain paradigms, whether or not this modality evokes spatial summation remains unknown. We aimed to answer this question in order to lay the foundation for critical studies of spatial summation. Twenty-five healthy participants received stimuli on their forearm, and the primary outcome, pain intensity, was compared across 5 spatial configurations-1 with a single stimulus and 4 paired configurations at 0-, 5-, 10-, and 20-cm separations. Importantly, the potential confounder of a proximal-distal gradient in nociceptive sensitivity was removed in this study. Pain intensity was higher in response to the paired stimuli than in response to the single stimulus (P < .001), and the paired stimuli separated by 5, 10 and 20 cm, evoked greater pain than stimuli at a separation of 0 cm (P < .001), thus confirming both area- and distance-based summation, respectively. We conclude that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is appropriate for future investigations of spatial summation.PERSPECTIVE: Distance-based summation is likely implicated in some clinical pain. However, current understanding for spatial summation is limited. This study demonstrates that transcutaneous electrical stimulation is safe, feasible, and valid for future investigations of spatial summation and will allow critical questions to be answered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919360762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 11

EP - 18

JO - Pain Forum

JF - Pain Forum

SN - 1526-5900

IS - 1

ER -