SP Program Benchmarking in the Australian Context - A Delphi analysis of the Simulated Patient Common Framework

Background:
Frameworks such as the Simulated Patient Common Framework or the INACSL Standards of Best Practice provide standards for benchmarking quality Simulated Participant Programs (SPPs); however, there is limited literature evaluating these frameworks in an Australian context and from the perspective of Simulated Participants (SPs). This study aimed to explore the perspectives of SPs and SPP faculty in Australia on the Simulated Patient Common Framework.

Method:
Using a modified Delphi technique, a panel of SPs and SPP Managers (N = 37)
rated the importance of 18 statements derived from Health Education England’s (HEE) SP Common Framework across 3 rounds. Consensus was defined a priori at 80% agreement. Qualitative comments were sought to understand their commentary and the features of a high-quality SPP.

Results:
Seventeen of the 18 statements within the HEE SP Common Framework reached
consensus by the end of Round 3. SP program documenting SP completion of training did not reach consensus. Using thematic analysis we identifiedperceived characteristics of highquality SPPs related to: employing the “right people”, clear and transparent communication, valuing the SP, a collaborative approach, and professional development.

Conclusions:
The HEE SP Common Framework was perceived by SPs and SPP Managers to be applicable in an Australian context. Recommendations for future practice suggested the framework should expand to include explicit recruitment strategy to employ SPs that represent diverse and priority communities.