Smoke and mirrors: Unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China

Wendy A. Rogers, Torsten Trey, Maria Fiatarone Singh, Madeleine Bridgett, Katrina A. Bramstedt, Jacob Lavee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-553
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume42
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

China
Prisoners
prisoner
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
Transplants
conscience
Organ Transplantation
donation
Ethics
moral philosophy
Tissue Donors
lack
Organs
Transplantation
Donation

Cite this

Rogers, Wendy A. ; Trey, Torsten ; Singh, Maria Fiatarone ; Bridgett, Madeleine ; Bramstedt, Katrina A. ; Lavee, Jacob. / Smoke and mirrors: Unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 8. pp. 552-553.
@article{901dfa483e1f4953947058bded2196cd,
title = "Smoke and mirrors: Unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China",
abstract = "This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience.",
author = "Rogers, {Wendy A.} and Torsten Trey and Singh, {Maria Fiatarone} and Madeleine Bridgett and Bramstedt, {Katrina A.} and Jacob Lavee",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2016-103533",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "552--553",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

Smoke and mirrors: Unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China. / Rogers, Wendy A.; Trey, Torsten; Singh, Maria Fiatarone; Bridgett, Madeleine; Bramstedt, Katrina A.; Lavee, Jacob.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 42, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 552-553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoke and mirrors: Unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China

AU - Rogers, Wendy A.

AU - Trey, Torsten

AU - Singh, Maria Fiatarone

AU - Bridgett, Madeleine

AU - Bramstedt, Katrina A.

AU - Lavee, Jacob

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience.

AB - This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966293685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2016-103533

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2016-103533

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 552

EP - 553

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 8

ER -