Abstract
We add to the literature on the real effects of macroprudential regulation by investigating the novel link between a mandatory capital adequacy disclosure and bank intermediation. The mandatory disclosure stems from the Federal Reserve regulation change of 2013 and leads to identification of bank intermediation effects with treatment methods. A combined empirical strategy of difference-in-differences and regression discontinuity design point to economically significant evidence for the reduction of both lending and on-balance sheet liquidity creation, for banks that disclose their capital adequacy as prescribed by the regulation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4387-4417 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Accounting and Finance |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 16 Sept 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |