Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should we screen for frailty in primary care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence base: A narrative review

  • R.C. Ambagtsheer*
  • , J.J. Beilby
  • , R. Visvanathan
  • , E. Dent
  • , S. Yu
  • , A.J. Braunack-Mayer
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

With older adults living longer, health service providers have increasingly turned their attention towards frailty and its significant consequences for health and well-being. Consequently, frailty screening has gained momentum as a possible health policy answer to the question of what can be done to prevent frailty's onset and progression. However, who should be screened for frailty, where and when remains a subject of extensive debate. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the dimensions of this question with reference to Wilson and Jungner's time-tested and widely accepted principles for acceptable screening within community settings. Although the balance of the emerging evidence to support frailty screening is promising, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Consequently, when assessed against Wilson and Jungner's principles, extensive population screening does not appear to be supported by the evidence. However, screening for the purpose of case-finding may prove useful among older adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-69
Number of pages7
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume119
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should we screen for frailty in primary care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence base: A narrative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this