Shooting for the Stars: Criteria for a Review of a Well-Regarded HR Function

Chris Andrews

    Research output: Contribution to journalMagazine ArticleProfessional

    Abstract

    [Extract] I was recently asked to comment on the terms of reference for an independent, external review of a Human Resources function. The function was well regarded, corporate benchmarks were being met or exceeded, employee relations were considered good to very good, and the key customer success measure was the envy of the organization’s competitors. Still, senior management wanted to review the priorities and scope of activities undertaken to aim higher and to sharpen focus.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalHR Examiner
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2019

    Fingerprint

    Benchmarking

    Cite this

    @article{a8c8df43c74b4978a8a738681e0caa38,
    title = "Shooting for the Stars: Criteria for a Review of a Well-Regarded HR Function",
    abstract = "[Extract] I was recently asked to comment on the terms of reference for an independent, external review of a Human Resources function. The function was well regarded, corporate benchmarks were being met or exceeded, employee relations were considered good to very good, and the key customer success measure was the envy of the organization’s competitors. Still, senior management wanted to review the priorities and scope of activities undertaken to aim higher and to sharpen focus.",
    author = "Chris Andrews",
    year = "2019",
    month = "10",
    day = "28",
    language = "English",
    journal = "HR Examiner",

    }

    Shooting for the Stars: Criteria for a Review of a Well-Regarded HR Function. / Andrews, Chris.

    In: HR Examiner, 28.10.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalMagazine ArticleProfessional

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Shooting for the Stars: Criteria for a Review of a Well-Regarded HR Function

    AU - Andrews, Chris

    PY - 2019/10/28

    Y1 - 2019/10/28

    N2 - [Extract] I was recently asked to comment on the terms of reference for an independent, external review of a Human Resources function. The function was well regarded, corporate benchmarks were being met or exceeded, employee relations were considered good to very good, and the key customer success measure was the envy of the organization’s competitors. Still, senior management wanted to review the priorities and scope of activities undertaken to aim higher and to sharpen focus.

    AB - [Extract] I was recently asked to comment on the terms of reference for an independent, external review of a Human Resources function. The function was well regarded, corporate benchmarks were being met or exceeded, employee relations were considered good to very good, and the key customer success measure was the envy of the organization’s competitors. Still, senior management wanted to review the priorities and scope of activities undertaken to aim higher and to sharpen focus.

    M3 - Magazine Article

    JO - HR Examiner

    JF - HR Examiner

    ER -