Abstract
Safety and productivity are often perceived as competing demands in a construction project organisation and the strategies of achieving them as a dilemma for project decision-making. We explore the safety-productivity paradox through an institutional logics lens. Through an in-depth single case study of climatic heat stress management in a subcontractor's project organisation under a mega-project in north Australia, the manifestations, consequences and interrelations of three institutional logics of processing safety in production are explored: The protection logic, the production logic and the reconciling logic. The results illustrate the paradoxical effects of the protection logic and the production logic and the emergence of a reconciling logic leading to innovation that improves both safety and productivity. However the reconciling logic is missing at senior and middle management levels of the production side of the organisation, and overwhelmed by the strong production logic. It is concluded that the reconciling logic can be further established and endorsed through adjusting the structure and modification of the production and human resource management system.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference |
Editors | Paul W. Chan, Christopher J. Neilsom |
Publisher | ARCOM |
Pages | 569-578 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Volume | 1 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-0-9955463-0-1 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 32nd Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2016 - Manchester, United Kingdom Duration: 5 Sept 2016 → 7 Sept 2016 |
Conference
Conference | 32nd Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2016 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Manchester |
Period | 5/09/16 → 7/09/16 |