Shared decision making: What do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?

Tammy C. Hoffmann, France Légaré, Magenta B. Simmons, Kevin McNamara, Kirsten McCaffery, Lyndal J. Trevena, Ben Hudson, Paul P. Glasziou, Christopher B. Del Mar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Shared decision making enables a clinician and patient to participate jointly in making a health decision, having discussed the options and their benefits and harms, and having considered the patient's values, preferences and circumstances. It is not a single step to be added into a consultation, but a process that can be used to guide decisions about screening, investigations and treatments. The benefits of shared decision making include enabling evidence and patients' preferences to be incorporated into a consultation; improving patient knowledge, risk perception accuracy and patient-clinician communication; and reducing decisional conflict, feeling uninformed and inappropriate use of tests and treatments. Various approaches can be used to guide clinicians through the process. We elaborate on five simple questions that can be used: What will happen if the patient waits and watches? What are the test or treatment options? What are the benefits and harms of each option? How do the benefits and harms weigh up for the patient? Does the patient have enough information to make a choice? Although shared decision making can occur without tools, various types of decision support tools now exist to facilitate it. Misconceptions about shared decision making are hampering its implementation. We address the barriers, as perceived by clinicians. Despite numerous international initiatives to advance shared decision making, very little has occurred in Australia. Consequently, we are lagging behind many other countries and should act urgently.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-39
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume201
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Patient Preference
Referral and Consultation
Emotions
Therapeutics
Communication
Health

Cite this

Hoffmann, Tammy C. ; Légaré, France ; Simmons, Magenta B. ; McNamara, Kevin ; McCaffery, Kirsten ; Trevena, Lyndal J. ; Hudson, Ben ; Glasziou, Paul P. ; Del Mar, Christopher B. / Shared decision making : What do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 2014 ; Vol. 201, No. 1. pp. 35-39.
@article{3d1f549c2f0a4a5eaabb475197ad00f7,
title = "Shared decision making: What do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?",
abstract = "Shared decision making enables a clinician and patient to participate jointly in making a health decision, having discussed the options and their benefits and harms, and having considered the patient's values, preferences and circumstances. It is not a single step to be added into a consultation, but a process that can be used to guide decisions about screening, investigations and treatments. The benefits of shared decision making include enabling evidence and patients' preferences to be incorporated into a consultation; improving patient knowledge, risk perception accuracy and patient-clinician communication; and reducing decisional conflict, feeling uninformed and inappropriate use of tests and treatments. Various approaches can be used to guide clinicians through the process. We elaborate on five simple questions that can be used: What will happen if the patient waits and watches? What are the test or treatment options? What are the benefits and harms of each option? How do the benefits and harms weigh up for the patient? Does the patient have enough information to make a choice? Although shared decision making can occur without tools, various types of decision support tools now exist to facilitate it. Misconceptions about shared decision making are hampering its implementation. We address the barriers, as perceived by clinicians. Despite numerous international initiatives to advance shared decision making, very little has occurred in Australia. Consequently, we are lagging behind many other countries and should act urgently.",
author = "Hoffmann, {Tammy C.} and France L{\'e}gar{\'e} and Simmons, {Magenta B.} and Kevin McNamara and Kirsten McCaffery and Trevena, {Lyndal J.} and Ben Hudson and Glasziou, {Paul P.} and {Del Mar}, {Christopher B.}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "7",
doi = "10.5694/mja14.00002",
language = "English",
volume = "201",
pages = "35--39",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD",
number = "1",

}

Shared decision making : What do clinicians need to know and why should they bother? / Hoffmann, Tammy C.; Légaré, France; Simmons, Magenta B.; McNamara, Kevin; McCaffery, Kirsten; Trevena, Lyndal J.; Hudson, Ben; Glasziou, Paul P.; Del Mar, Christopher B.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 201, No. 1, 07.07.2014, p. 35-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared decision making

T2 - What do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy C.

AU - Légaré, France

AU - Simmons, Magenta B.

AU - McNamara, Kevin

AU - McCaffery, Kirsten

AU - Trevena, Lyndal J.

AU - Hudson, Ben

AU - Glasziou, Paul P.

AU - Del Mar, Christopher B.

PY - 2014/7/7

Y1 - 2014/7/7

N2 - Shared decision making enables a clinician and patient to participate jointly in making a health decision, having discussed the options and their benefits and harms, and having considered the patient's values, preferences and circumstances. It is not a single step to be added into a consultation, but a process that can be used to guide decisions about screening, investigations and treatments. The benefits of shared decision making include enabling evidence and patients' preferences to be incorporated into a consultation; improving patient knowledge, risk perception accuracy and patient-clinician communication; and reducing decisional conflict, feeling uninformed and inappropriate use of tests and treatments. Various approaches can be used to guide clinicians through the process. We elaborate on five simple questions that can be used: What will happen if the patient waits and watches? What are the test or treatment options? What are the benefits and harms of each option? How do the benefits and harms weigh up for the patient? Does the patient have enough information to make a choice? Although shared decision making can occur without tools, various types of decision support tools now exist to facilitate it. Misconceptions about shared decision making are hampering its implementation. We address the barriers, as perceived by clinicians. Despite numerous international initiatives to advance shared decision making, very little has occurred in Australia. Consequently, we are lagging behind many other countries and should act urgently.

AB - Shared decision making enables a clinician and patient to participate jointly in making a health decision, having discussed the options and their benefits and harms, and having considered the patient's values, preferences and circumstances. It is not a single step to be added into a consultation, but a process that can be used to guide decisions about screening, investigations and treatments. The benefits of shared decision making include enabling evidence and patients' preferences to be incorporated into a consultation; improving patient knowledge, risk perception accuracy and patient-clinician communication; and reducing decisional conflict, feeling uninformed and inappropriate use of tests and treatments. Various approaches can be used to guide clinicians through the process. We elaborate on five simple questions that can be used: What will happen if the patient waits and watches? What are the test or treatment options? What are the benefits and harms of each option? How do the benefits and harms weigh up for the patient? Does the patient have enough information to make a choice? Although shared decision making can occur without tools, various types of decision support tools now exist to facilitate it. Misconceptions about shared decision making are hampering its implementation. We address the barriers, as perceived by clinicians. Despite numerous international initiatives to advance shared decision making, very little has occurred in Australia. Consequently, we are lagging behind many other countries and should act urgently.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904462764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja14.00002

DO - 10.5694/mja14.00002

M3 - Article

VL - 201

SP - 35

EP - 39

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 1

ER -