Sentencing and public confidence: Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing

Geraldine Mackenzie, Caroline Spiranovic, Kate Warner, Nigel Stobbs, Karen Gelb, David Indermaur, Lynne D. Roberts, Rod Broadhurst, Thierry Bouhours

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines the critical issue of public confidence in sentencing, and presents findings from Phase I of an Australia-wide sentencing and public confidence project. Phase I comprised a nationally representative telephone survey of 6005 participants. The majority of respondents expressed high levels of punitiveness and were dissatisfied with sentences imposed by the courts. Despite this, many were strongly supportive of the use of alternatives to imprisonment for a range of offences. These nuanced views raise questions regarding the efficacy of gauging public opinion using opinion poll style questions; indeed the expected outcome from this first phase of the four phase sentencing and public confidence project. The following phases of this project, reported on elsewhere, examined the effects of various interventions on the robustness and nature of these views initially expressed in a standard 'top of the head' opinion poll.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-65
Number of pages21
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Public Opinion
public opinion
opinion poll
confidence
Telephone
Head
imprisonment
telephone
offense
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Mackenzie, Geraldine ; Spiranovic, Caroline ; Warner, Kate ; Stobbs, Nigel ; Gelb, Karen ; Indermaur, David ; Roberts, Lynne D. ; Broadhurst, Rod ; Bouhours, Thierry. / Sentencing and public confidence : Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing. In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 2012 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 45-65.
@article{33729cdf1dc24fdcab0fc3432600b86d,
title = "Sentencing and public confidence: Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing",
abstract = "This paper examines the critical issue of public confidence in sentencing, and presents findings from Phase I of an Australia-wide sentencing and public confidence project. Phase I comprised a nationally representative telephone survey of 6005 participants. The majority of respondents expressed high levels of punitiveness and were dissatisfied with sentences imposed by the courts. Despite this, many were strongly supportive of the use of alternatives to imprisonment for a range of offences. These nuanced views raise questions regarding the efficacy of gauging public opinion using opinion poll style questions; indeed the expected outcome from this first phase of the four phase sentencing and public confidence project. The following phases of this project, reported on elsewhere, examined the effects of various interventions on the robustness and nature of these views initially expressed in a standard 'top of the head' opinion poll.",
author = "Geraldine Mackenzie and Caroline Spiranovic and Kate Warner and Nigel Stobbs and Karen Gelb and David Indermaur and Roberts, {Lynne D.} and Rod Broadhurst and Thierry Bouhours",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0004865811431328",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "45--65",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology",
issn = "0004-8658",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Mackenzie, G, Spiranovic, C, Warner, K, Stobbs, N, Gelb, K, Indermaur, D, Roberts, LD, Broadhurst, R & Bouhours, T 2012, 'Sentencing and public confidence: Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing' Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865811431328

Sentencing and public confidence : Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing. / Mackenzie, Geraldine; Spiranovic, Caroline; Warner, Kate; Stobbs, Nigel; Gelb, Karen; Indermaur, David; Roberts, Lynne D.; Broadhurst, Rod; Bouhours, Thierry.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 04.2012, p. 45-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sentencing and public confidence

T2 - Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing

AU - Mackenzie, Geraldine

AU - Spiranovic, Caroline

AU - Warner, Kate

AU - Stobbs, Nigel

AU - Gelb, Karen

AU - Indermaur, David

AU - Roberts, Lynne D.

AU - Broadhurst, Rod

AU - Bouhours, Thierry

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - This paper examines the critical issue of public confidence in sentencing, and presents findings from Phase I of an Australia-wide sentencing and public confidence project. Phase I comprised a nationally representative telephone survey of 6005 participants. The majority of respondents expressed high levels of punitiveness and were dissatisfied with sentences imposed by the courts. Despite this, many were strongly supportive of the use of alternatives to imprisonment for a range of offences. These nuanced views raise questions regarding the efficacy of gauging public opinion using opinion poll style questions; indeed the expected outcome from this first phase of the four phase sentencing and public confidence project. The following phases of this project, reported on elsewhere, examined the effects of various interventions on the robustness and nature of these views initially expressed in a standard 'top of the head' opinion poll.

AB - This paper examines the critical issue of public confidence in sentencing, and presents findings from Phase I of an Australia-wide sentencing and public confidence project. Phase I comprised a nationally representative telephone survey of 6005 participants. The majority of respondents expressed high levels of punitiveness and were dissatisfied with sentences imposed by the courts. Despite this, many were strongly supportive of the use of alternatives to imprisonment for a range of offences. These nuanced views raise questions regarding the efficacy of gauging public opinion using opinion poll style questions; indeed the expected outcome from this first phase of the four phase sentencing and public confidence project. The following phases of this project, reported on elsewhere, examined the effects of various interventions on the robustness and nature of these views initially expressed in a standard 'top of the head' opinion poll.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864807744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0004865811431328

DO - 10.1177/0004865811431328

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 45

EP - 65

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

SN - 0004-8658

IS - 1

ER -