Self-help organisations: A qualitative study of successful collaboration with general practice

Frances M. Boyle (UQ), Natasha T Posner, Chris B Del Mar, Jill McLean, Robert A Bush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Thousands of self-help organisations (SHOs) exist in Australia but little is known about how they relate to the mainstream health care system. This qualitative study, based in south-east Queensland, aimed to identify examples of collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SHOs in order to examine the attributes of successful partnerships. Representatives of six SHOs, identified by key informants as having good collaborative links with GPs, and seven GPs with whom they collaborated, completed semi-structured interviews. The interviews focused on evidence of collaboration and perceptions of benefits and barriers experienced. Maximum variation sampling enabled a cross-section of SHOs in terms of size, funding, and health issue. Although GPs readily identified SHO benefits, they referred patients to them only rarely. SHO credibility, evidence of tangible benefits for patients, ease of contacting the SHO, and correspondence between the SHO?s focus and the GP?s personal and professional interests appear to contribute to the success of partnerships. We conclude that mutually beneficial partnerships between GPs and SHOs exist but are under-utilised. A more coordinated effort is needed to strengthen links between the two sectors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-79
Number of pages5
JournalAustralian Journal of Primary Health
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

General Practice
General Practitioners
Interviews
Queensland
Delivery of Health Care
Health

Cite this

Boyle (UQ), Frances M. ; Posner, Natasha T ; Del Mar, Chris B ; McLean, Jill ; Bush, Robert A. / Self-help organisations : A qualitative study of successful collaboration with general practice. In: Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2003 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 75-79.
@article{72589d7d65f140728093973f38e021f0,
title = "Self-help organisations: A qualitative study of successful collaboration with general practice",
abstract = "Thousands of self-help organisations (SHOs) exist in Australia but little is known about how they relate to the mainstream health care system. This qualitative study, based in south-east Queensland, aimed to identify examples of collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SHOs in order to examine the attributes of successful partnerships. Representatives of six SHOs, identified by key informants as having good collaborative links with GPs, and seven GPs with whom they collaborated, completed semi-structured interviews. The interviews focused on evidence of collaboration and perceptions of benefits and barriers experienced. Maximum variation sampling enabled a cross-section of SHOs in terms of size, funding, and health issue. Although GPs readily identified SHO benefits, they referred patients to them only rarely. SHO credibility, evidence of tangible benefits for patients, ease of contacting the SHO, and correspondence between the SHO?s focus and the GP?s personal and professional interests appear to contribute to the success of partnerships. We conclude that mutually beneficial partnerships between GPs and SHOs exist but are under-utilised. A more coordinated effort is needed to strengthen links between the two sectors.",
author = "{Boyle (UQ)}, {Frances M.} and Posner, {Natasha T} and {Del Mar}, {Chris B} and Jill McLean and Bush, {Robert A}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1071/PY03027",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "75--79",
journal = "Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange",
issn = "1324-2296",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "3",

}

Self-help organisations : A qualitative study of successful collaboration with general practice. / Boyle (UQ), Frances M.; Posner, Natasha T; Del Mar, Chris B; McLean, Jill; Bush, Robert A.

In: Australian Journal of Primary Health, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2003, p. 75-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-help organisations

T2 - A qualitative study of successful collaboration with general practice

AU - Boyle (UQ), Frances M.

AU - Posner, Natasha T

AU - Del Mar, Chris B

AU - McLean, Jill

AU - Bush, Robert A

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Thousands of self-help organisations (SHOs) exist in Australia but little is known about how they relate to the mainstream health care system. This qualitative study, based in south-east Queensland, aimed to identify examples of collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SHOs in order to examine the attributes of successful partnerships. Representatives of six SHOs, identified by key informants as having good collaborative links with GPs, and seven GPs with whom they collaborated, completed semi-structured interviews. The interviews focused on evidence of collaboration and perceptions of benefits and barriers experienced. Maximum variation sampling enabled a cross-section of SHOs in terms of size, funding, and health issue. Although GPs readily identified SHO benefits, they referred patients to them only rarely. SHO credibility, evidence of tangible benefits for patients, ease of contacting the SHO, and correspondence between the SHO?s focus and the GP?s personal and professional interests appear to contribute to the success of partnerships. We conclude that mutually beneficial partnerships between GPs and SHOs exist but are under-utilised. A more coordinated effort is needed to strengthen links between the two sectors.

AB - Thousands of self-help organisations (SHOs) exist in Australia but little is known about how they relate to the mainstream health care system. This qualitative study, based in south-east Queensland, aimed to identify examples of collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SHOs in order to examine the attributes of successful partnerships. Representatives of six SHOs, identified by key informants as having good collaborative links with GPs, and seven GPs with whom they collaborated, completed semi-structured interviews. The interviews focused on evidence of collaboration and perceptions of benefits and barriers experienced. Maximum variation sampling enabled a cross-section of SHOs in terms of size, funding, and health issue. Although GPs readily identified SHO benefits, they referred patients to them only rarely. SHO credibility, evidence of tangible benefits for patients, ease of contacting the SHO, and correspondence between the SHO?s focus and the GP?s personal and professional interests appear to contribute to the success of partnerships. We conclude that mutually beneficial partnerships between GPs and SHOs exist but are under-utilised. A more coordinated effort is needed to strengthen links between the two sectors.

U2 - 10.1071/PY03027

DO - 10.1071/PY03027

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 75

EP - 79

JO - Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange

JF - Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange

SN - 1324-2296

IS - 3

ER -