Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision

Daniel S Harvie, Ann Meulders, Emily Reid, Danny Camfferman, Russell S A Brinkworth, G Lorimer Moseley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Learning to initiate defenses in response to specific signals of danger is adaptive. Some chronic pain conditions, however, are characterized by widespread anxiety, avoidance, and pain consistent with a loss of defensive response specificity. Response specificity depends on ability to discriminate between safe and threatening stimuli; therefore, specificity might depend on sensory precision. This would help explain the high prevalence of chronic pain in body areas of low tactile acuity, such as the lower back, and clarify why improving sensory precision may reduce chronic pain. We compared the acquisition and generalization of fear of pain-associated vibrotactile stimuli delivered to either the hand (high tactile acuity) or the back (low tactile acuity). During acquisition, tactile stimulation at one location (CS+) predicted the noxious electrocutaneous stimulation (US), while tactile stimulation at another location (CS-) did not. Responses to three stimuli with decreasing spatial proximity to the CS+ (generalizing stimuli; GS1-3) were tested. Differential learning and generalization were compared between groups. The main outcome of fear-potentiated startle responses showed differential learning only in the hand group. Self-reported fear and expectancy confirmed differential learning and limited generalization in the hand group, and suggested undifferentiated fear and expectancy in the back group. Differences in generalization could not be inferred from the startle data. Specificity of fear responses appears to be affected by somatosensory precision. This has implications for our understanding of the role of sensory imprecision in the development of chronic pain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)921-929
Number of pages9
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Touch
Fear
Chronic Pain
Learning
Hand
Startle Reflex
Pain
Aptitude
Anxiety

Cite this

Harvie, D. S., Meulders, A., Reid, E., Camfferman, D., Brinkworth, R. S. A., & Moseley, G. L. (2016). Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision. Psychophysiology, 53(6), 921-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12631
Harvie, Daniel S ; Meulders, Ann ; Reid, Emily ; Camfferman, Danny ; Brinkworth, Russell S A ; Moseley, G Lorimer. / Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision. In: Psychophysiology. 2016 ; Vol. 53, No. 6. pp. 921-929.
@article{47a791dde88748c0bad340bab1bb53ea,
title = "Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision",
abstract = "Learning to initiate defenses in response to specific signals of danger is adaptive. Some chronic pain conditions, however, are characterized by widespread anxiety, avoidance, and pain consistent with a loss of defensive response specificity. Response specificity depends on ability to discriminate between safe and threatening stimuli; therefore, specificity might depend on sensory precision. This would help explain the high prevalence of chronic pain in body areas of low tactile acuity, such as the lower back, and clarify why improving sensory precision may reduce chronic pain. We compared the acquisition and generalization of fear of pain-associated vibrotactile stimuli delivered to either the hand (high tactile acuity) or the back (low tactile acuity). During acquisition, tactile stimulation at one location (CS+) predicted the noxious electrocutaneous stimulation (US), while tactile stimulation at another location (CS-) did not. Responses to three stimuli with decreasing spatial proximity to the CS+ (generalizing stimuli; GS1-3) were tested. Differential learning and generalization were compared between groups. The main outcome of fear-potentiated startle responses showed differential learning only in the hand group. Self-reported fear and expectancy confirmed differential learning and limited generalization in the hand group, and suggested undifferentiated fear and expectancy in the back group. Differences in generalization could not be inferred from the startle data. Specificity of fear responses appears to be affected by somatosensory precision. This has implications for our understanding of the role of sensory imprecision in the development of chronic pain.",
author = "Harvie, {Daniel S} and Ann Meulders and Emily Reid and Danny Camfferman and Brinkworth, {Russell S A} and Moseley, {G Lorimer}",
note = "{\circledC} 2016 Society for Psychophysiological Research.",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/psyp.12631",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "921--929",
journal = "Psychophysiology",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Harvie, DS, Meulders, A, Reid, E, Camfferman, D, Brinkworth, RSA & Moseley, GL 2016, 'Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision' Psychophysiology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 921-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12631

Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision. / Harvie, Daniel S; Meulders, Ann; Reid, Emily; Camfferman, Danny; Brinkworth, Russell S A; Moseley, G Lorimer.

In: Psychophysiology, Vol. 53, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 921-929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision

AU - Harvie, Daniel S

AU - Meulders, Ann

AU - Reid, Emily

AU - Camfferman, Danny

AU - Brinkworth, Russell S A

AU - Moseley, G Lorimer

N1 - © 2016 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Learning to initiate defenses in response to specific signals of danger is adaptive. Some chronic pain conditions, however, are characterized by widespread anxiety, avoidance, and pain consistent with a loss of defensive response specificity. Response specificity depends on ability to discriminate between safe and threatening stimuli; therefore, specificity might depend on sensory precision. This would help explain the high prevalence of chronic pain in body areas of low tactile acuity, such as the lower back, and clarify why improving sensory precision may reduce chronic pain. We compared the acquisition and generalization of fear of pain-associated vibrotactile stimuli delivered to either the hand (high tactile acuity) or the back (low tactile acuity). During acquisition, tactile stimulation at one location (CS+) predicted the noxious electrocutaneous stimulation (US), while tactile stimulation at another location (CS-) did not. Responses to three stimuli with decreasing spatial proximity to the CS+ (generalizing stimuli; GS1-3) were tested. Differential learning and generalization were compared between groups. The main outcome of fear-potentiated startle responses showed differential learning only in the hand group. Self-reported fear and expectancy confirmed differential learning and limited generalization in the hand group, and suggested undifferentiated fear and expectancy in the back group. Differences in generalization could not be inferred from the startle data. Specificity of fear responses appears to be affected by somatosensory precision. This has implications for our understanding of the role of sensory imprecision in the development of chronic pain.

AB - Learning to initiate defenses in response to specific signals of danger is adaptive. Some chronic pain conditions, however, are characterized by widespread anxiety, avoidance, and pain consistent with a loss of defensive response specificity. Response specificity depends on ability to discriminate between safe and threatening stimuli; therefore, specificity might depend on sensory precision. This would help explain the high prevalence of chronic pain in body areas of low tactile acuity, such as the lower back, and clarify why improving sensory precision may reduce chronic pain. We compared the acquisition and generalization of fear of pain-associated vibrotactile stimuli delivered to either the hand (high tactile acuity) or the back (low tactile acuity). During acquisition, tactile stimulation at one location (CS+) predicted the noxious electrocutaneous stimulation (US), while tactile stimulation at another location (CS-) did not. Responses to three stimuli with decreasing spatial proximity to the CS+ (generalizing stimuli; GS1-3) were tested. Differential learning and generalization were compared between groups. The main outcome of fear-potentiated startle responses showed differential learning only in the hand group. Self-reported fear and expectancy confirmed differential learning and limited generalization in the hand group, and suggested undifferentiated fear and expectancy in the back group. Differences in generalization could not be inferred from the startle data. Specificity of fear responses appears to be affected by somatosensory precision. This has implications for our understanding of the role of sensory imprecision in the development of chronic pain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960192830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/psyp.12631

DO - 10.1111/psyp.12631

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 921

EP - 929

JO - Psychophysiology

JF - Psychophysiology

SN - 0048-5772

IS - 6

ER -

Harvie DS, Meulders A, Reid E, Camfferman D, Brinkworth RSA, Moseley GL. Selectivity of conditioned fear of touch is modulated by somatosensory precision. Psychophysiology. 2016 Jun 1;53(6):921-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12631