SDCV v Director-General of Security: Procedural Fairness and the Ability to Decide a Matter Based on Secret Evidence Not Disclosed to a Party or Their Legal Team

Anthony Gray, Pauline Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article considers the increased use of so-called secret evidence, where a party to a proceeding that would or might be affected by particular evidence is not given access to it (and thereby a chance to respond to it) prior to a decision which utilises such material is made. Members of the High Court are increasingly hostile to the use of such provisions on the basis it might offend the requirements of Chapter III of the Constitution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-68
Number of pages12
JournalAustralian Law Journal
Volume98
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SDCV v Director-General of Security: Procedural Fairness and the Ability to Decide a Matter Based on Secret Evidence Not Disclosed to a Party or Their Legal Team'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this