Role of professional networks on social media in addressing clinical questions at general practice: a cross-sectional study of general practitioners in Australia and New Zealand

Loai Albarqouni, Tammy Hoffmann, Katrina McLean, Karen Price, Paul Glasziou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently have questions about patient care. However, for more than half of the generated questions, answers are never pursued, and if they are, often not answered satisfactorily. We aimed to characterise the clinical questions asked and answers provided by general practitioners (GP) through posts to a popular professional social media network.

METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analysed clinical questions and answers posted between January 20th and February 10th 2018 on a popular GP-restricted (Australia, New Zealand) Facebook group. Each clinical question was categorised according to 'background' or 'foreground' question; type (e.g. treatment, diagnosis); and the clinical topic (e.g. cardiovascular). Each answer provided in response to included questions was categorised into: (i) short answer (e.g. agree/disagree); (ii) provided an explanation to justify the answer; and (iii) referred to a published relevant evidence resource.

RESULTS: Of 1060 new posts during the study period, 204 (19%) included a clinical question. GPs most commonly asked about treatment (n = 87; 43%) and diagnosis (n = 59; 29%). Five major topics (23% skin, 10% psychology, 9% cardiovascular, 8% female genital, and 7% musculoskeletal) accounted for 118 (58%) questions. Each question received on average 10 (SD = 9) answers: 42% were short; 51% provided an explanation; and only 6% referred to relevant research evidence. Only 3 answers referred to systematic reviews.

CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of Australian and New Zealand GPs, who were members of a GP social media group, GPs asked clinical questions that can be organised into a limited number of question types and topics. This might help guide the development of GP learning programs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number43
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Social Media
Professional Role
New Zealand
General Practice
General Practitioners
Cross-Sectional Studies
Social Support
Patient Care
Learning
Psychology
Skin
Therapeutics
Research

Cite this

@article{49040a577605435b8907d52714c69893,
title = "Role of professional networks on social media in addressing clinical questions at general practice: a cross-sectional study of general practitioners in Australia and New Zealand",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently have questions about patient care. However, for more than half of the generated questions, answers are never pursued, and if they are, often not answered satisfactorily. We aimed to characterise the clinical questions asked and answers provided by general practitioners (GP) through posts to a popular professional social media network.METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analysed clinical questions and answers posted between January 20th and February 10th 2018 on a popular GP-restricted (Australia, New Zealand) Facebook group. Each clinical question was categorised according to 'background' or 'foreground' question; type (e.g. treatment, diagnosis); and the clinical topic (e.g. cardiovascular). Each answer provided in response to included questions was categorised into: (i) short answer (e.g. agree/disagree); (ii) provided an explanation to justify the answer; and (iii) referred to a published relevant evidence resource.RESULTS: Of 1060 new posts during the study period, 204 (19{\%}) included a clinical question. GPs most commonly asked about treatment (n = 87; 43{\%}) and diagnosis (n = 59; 29{\%}). Five major topics (23{\%} skin, 10{\%} psychology, 9{\%} cardiovascular, 8{\%} female genital, and 7{\%} musculoskeletal) accounted for 118 (58{\%}) questions. Each question received on average 10 (SD = 9) answers: 42{\%} were short; 51{\%} provided an explanation; and only 6{\%} referred to relevant research evidence. Only 3 answers referred to systematic reviews.CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of Australian and New Zealand GPs, who were members of a GP social media group, GPs asked clinical questions that can be organised into a limited number of question types and topics. This might help guide the development of GP learning programs.",
author = "Loai Albarqouni and Tammy Hoffmann and Katrina McLean and Karen Price and Paul Glasziou",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1186/s12875-019-0931-x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "BMC Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BMC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of professional networks on social media in addressing clinical questions at general practice

T2 - a cross-sectional study of general practitioners in Australia and New Zealand

AU - Albarqouni, Loai

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

AU - McLean, Katrina

AU - Price, Karen

AU - Glasziou, Paul

PY - 2019/3/6

Y1 - 2019/3/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently have questions about patient care. However, for more than half of the generated questions, answers are never pursued, and if they are, often not answered satisfactorily. We aimed to characterise the clinical questions asked and answers provided by general practitioners (GP) through posts to a popular professional social media network.METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analysed clinical questions and answers posted between January 20th and February 10th 2018 on a popular GP-restricted (Australia, New Zealand) Facebook group. Each clinical question was categorised according to 'background' or 'foreground' question; type (e.g. treatment, diagnosis); and the clinical topic (e.g. cardiovascular). Each answer provided in response to included questions was categorised into: (i) short answer (e.g. agree/disagree); (ii) provided an explanation to justify the answer; and (iii) referred to a published relevant evidence resource.RESULTS: Of 1060 new posts during the study period, 204 (19%) included a clinical question. GPs most commonly asked about treatment (n = 87; 43%) and diagnosis (n = 59; 29%). Five major topics (23% skin, 10% psychology, 9% cardiovascular, 8% female genital, and 7% musculoskeletal) accounted for 118 (58%) questions. Each question received on average 10 (SD = 9) answers: 42% were short; 51% provided an explanation; and only 6% referred to relevant research evidence. Only 3 answers referred to systematic reviews.CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of Australian and New Zealand GPs, who were members of a GP social media group, GPs asked clinical questions that can be organised into a limited number of question types and topics. This might help guide the development of GP learning programs.

AB - BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently have questions about patient care. However, for more than half of the generated questions, answers are never pursued, and if they are, often not answered satisfactorily. We aimed to characterise the clinical questions asked and answers provided by general practitioners (GP) through posts to a popular professional social media network.METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analysed clinical questions and answers posted between January 20th and February 10th 2018 on a popular GP-restricted (Australia, New Zealand) Facebook group. Each clinical question was categorised according to 'background' or 'foreground' question; type (e.g. treatment, diagnosis); and the clinical topic (e.g. cardiovascular). Each answer provided in response to included questions was categorised into: (i) short answer (e.g. agree/disagree); (ii) provided an explanation to justify the answer; and (iii) referred to a published relevant evidence resource.RESULTS: Of 1060 new posts during the study period, 204 (19%) included a clinical question. GPs most commonly asked about treatment (n = 87; 43%) and diagnosis (n = 59; 29%). Five major topics (23% skin, 10% psychology, 9% cardiovascular, 8% female genital, and 7% musculoskeletal) accounted for 118 (58%) questions. Each question received on average 10 (SD = 9) answers: 42% were short; 51% provided an explanation; and only 6% referred to relevant research evidence. Only 3 answers referred to systematic reviews.CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of Australian and New Zealand GPs, who were members of a GP social media group, GPs asked clinical questions that can be organised into a limited number of question types and topics. This might help guide the development of GP learning programs.

U2 - 10.1186/s12875-019-0931-x

DO - 10.1186/s12875-019-0931-x

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - BMC Family Practice

JF - BMC Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

IS - 1

M1 - 43

ER -