TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk attitudes and sun protection behaviour: Can behaviour be altered by using a melanoma genomic risk intervention?
AU - Morton, Rachael L.
AU - Asher, Rebecca
AU - Peyton, Edward
AU - Tran, Anh
AU - Smit, Amelia K.
AU - Butow, Phyllis N.
AU - Kimlin, Michael G.
AU - Dobbinson, Suzanne J.
AU - Wordsworth, Sarah
AU - Keogh, Louise
AU - Cust, Anne E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study received funding from Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre and The University of Sydney Cancer Strategic Priority Area for Research Collaboration (SPARC) Implementation Scheme. RL Morton was supported by a NHMRC Sidney Sax Fellowship (1054216). AK Smit received a Research Training Program (RTP) Stipend Scholarship and a Merit Top Up Scholarship from the University of Sydney , and a Top Up Scholar Award from the Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre . MG Kimlin is supported through a Cancer Council Queensland Professorial Chair in Cancer Prevention. AE Cust received Career Development Fellowships from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC; 1147843) and Cancer Institute NSW (15/CDF/1–14).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Background:Exposure to ultraviolet radiation from sunlight is directly associated with melanoma skin cancer, however reducing sun-exposure can be difficult to achieve at a population level.Methods: Using a genomic risk information behaviour change trial for melanoma prevention, we classified participants as risk-seeking, risk-neutral or risk-averse for domain-specific risk taking (DOSPERT). One-way ANOVA determined the association between socio-demographic characteristics and risk-taking score, and multivariable linear regression ascertained impact of an individual's underlying risk propensity on an objective measure of sun-exposure, standard erythemal dose (SED), at 3-months follow-up. Results: Of 119 participants, mean age 53 years; 50% males, 87% had a personal/family history of cancer; 19% were classified risk-seeking, 57% risk-neutral. The mean risk-taking score was significantly higher in younger participants (≤50 years: 13.86 vs. >50 years: 11.11, p = 0.003); and lower in those with a personal/family history of skin cancer versus without (10.55 vs 13.33, p = 0.009). Risk averse individuals had lower weekly mean SEDs at 3-months than risk neutral and risk seeking individuals (2.56, 5.81, 4.81 respectively, p = 0.01). Risk seekers showed fewer sun protective habits (p < 0.001); and higher intentional tanning, (p = 0.01). At 3-months, risk seekers attained 16%–54% lower SEDs in the genomic information group compared with controls, however this was not significantly different across risk groups (interaction p = 0.13). Conclusion: An individual's underlying risk attitude is likely associated with sun-exposure behaviours, and may modify the effect of a genomic risk information behaviour change intervention. Young people and risk seekers may benefit most from being given information on their genetic risk of melanoma.
AB - Background:Exposure to ultraviolet radiation from sunlight is directly associated with melanoma skin cancer, however reducing sun-exposure can be difficult to achieve at a population level.Methods: Using a genomic risk information behaviour change trial for melanoma prevention, we classified participants as risk-seeking, risk-neutral or risk-averse for domain-specific risk taking (DOSPERT). One-way ANOVA determined the association between socio-demographic characteristics and risk-taking score, and multivariable linear regression ascertained impact of an individual's underlying risk propensity on an objective measure of sun-exposure, standard erythemal dose (SED), at 3-months follow-up. Results: Of 119 participants, mean age 53 years; 50% males, 87% had a personal/family history of cancer; 19% were classified risk-seeking, 57% risk-neutral. The mean risk-taking score was significantly higher in younger participants (≤50 years: 13.86 vs. >50 years: 11.11, p = 0.003); and lower in those with a personal/family history of skin cancer versus without (10.55 vs 13.33, p = 0.009). Risk averse individuals had lower weekly mean SEDs at 3-months than risk neutral and risk seeking individuals (2.56, 5.81, 4.81 respectively, p = 0.01). Risk seekers showed fewer sun protective habits (p < 0.001); and higher intentional tanning, (p = 0.01). At 3-months, risk seekers attained 16%–54% lower SEDs in the genomic information group compared with controls, however this was not significantly different across risk groups (interaction p = 0.13). Conclusion: An individual's underlying risk attitude is likely associated with sun-exposure behaviours, and may modify the effect of a genomic risk information behaviour change intervention. Young people and risk seekers may benefit most from being given information on their genetic risk of melanoma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065592558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.canep.2019.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.canep.2019.05.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 31102918
AN - SCOPUS:85065592558
SN - 1877-7821
VL - 61
SP - 8
EP - 13
JO - Cancer Epidemiology
JF - Cancer Epidemiology
ER -