Risk Assessment

Jessica Gormley, Wayne Petherick

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In forensic psychology, risk assessment refers to the practice of evaluating the chance that an individual will re-offend. Historically, professionals would utilize their own clinical judgment in an effort to predict risk; however, because of the inaccuracy of prediction outcomes, a more statistical approach was developed, known as actuarial risk assessment. Although these more structured assessments improved the prediction of risk, research has largely been inconsistent regarding their accuracy. As a result, new procedures were developed, and best practice now involves structured professional judgment, a combination of the actuarial and clinical judgment approaches. Risk assessment is not yet an exact science; although there are advantages to each of the approaches, there are also disadvantages; and, finally, discussions of risk need to be undertaken from a responsible perspective, particularly when communicating risk. Risk assessment is common practice in high-stakes cases, such as those involving civil commitment. Therefore, and particularly given the lack of guidelines, when communicating risk, it is important to be cautious and transparent about the issues of the tools used. The chapter outlines examples of good practice, as well as examples of unprofessional practice, concluding with suggestions on what to do when harm is likely or imminent.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationApplied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims
EditorsW Petherick
PublisherElsevier
Chapter9
Pages172-189
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780323296410
ISBN (Print)9780323294607
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2014

Fingerprint

risk assessment
best practice
forensic psychology
risk research
commitment
lack
science

Cite this

Gormley, J., & Petherick, W. (2014). Risk Assessment. In W. Petherick (Ed.), Applied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims (pp. 172-189). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-29460-7.00009-0
Gormley, Jessica ; Petherick, Wayne. / Risk Assessment. Applied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims. editor / W Petherick. Elsevier, 2014. pp. 172-189
@inbook{6c313aa9b494401a9e9cb5f2d27a0008,
title = "Risk Assessment",
abstract = "In forensic psychology, risk assessment refers to the practice of evaluating the chance that an individual will re-offend. Historically, professionals would utilize their own clinical judgment in an effort to predict risk; however, because of the inaccuracy of prediction outcomes, a more statistical approach was developed, known as actuarial risk assessment. Although these more structured assessments improved the prediction of risk, research has largely been inconsistent regarding their accuracy. As a result, new procedures were developed, and best practice now involves structured professional judgment, a combination of the actuarial and clinical judgment approaches. Risk assessment is not yet an exact science; although there are advantages to each of the approaches, there are also disadvantages; and, finally, discussions of risk need to be undertaken from a responsible perspective, particularly when communicating risk. Risk assessment is common practice in high-stakes cases, such as those involving civil commitment. Therefore, and particularly given the lack of guidelines, when communicating risk, it is important to be cautious and transparent about the issues of the tools used. The chapter outlines examples of good practice, as well as examples of unprofessional practice, concluding with suggestions on what to do when harm is likely or imminent.",
author = "Jessica Gormley and Wayne Petherick",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-323-29460-7.00009-0",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780323294607",
pages = "172--189",
editor = "W Petherick",
booktitle = "Applied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims",
publisher = "Elsevier",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Gormley, J & Petherick, W 2014, Risk Assessment. in W Petherick (ed.), Applied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims. Elsevier, pp. 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-29460-7.00009-0

Risk Assessment. / Gormley, Jessica; Petherick, Wayne.

Applied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims. ed. / W Petherick. Elsevier, 2014. p. 172-189.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Risk Assessment

AU - Gormley, Jessica

AU - Petherick, Wayne

PY - 2014/6/18

Y1 - 2014/6/18

N2 - In forensic psychology, risk assessment refers to the practice of evaluating the chance that an individual will re-offend. Historically, professionals would utilize their own clinical judgment in an effort to predict risk; however, because of the inaccuracy of prediction outcomes, a more statistical approach was developed, known as actuarial risk assessment. Although these more structured assessments improved the prediction of risk, research has largely been inconsistent regarding their accuracy. As a result, new procedures were developed, and best practice now involves structured professional judgment, a combination of the actuarial and clinical judgment approaches. Risk assessment is not yet an exact science; although there are advantages to each of the approaches, there are also disadvantages; and, finally, discussions of risk need to be undertaken from a responsible perspective, particularly when communicating risk. Risk assessment is common practice in high-stakes cases, such as those involving civil commitment. Therefore, and particularly given the lack of guidelines, when communicating risk, it is important to be cautious and transparent about the issues of the tools used. The chapter outlines examples of good practice, as well as examples of unprofessional practice, concluding with suggestions on what to do when harm is likely or imminent.

AB - In forensic psychology, risk assessment refers to the practice of evaluating the chance that an individual will re-offend. Historically, professionals would utilize their own clinical judgment in an effort to predict risk; however, because of the inaccuracy of prediction outcomes, a more statistical approach was developed, known as actuarial risk assessment. Although these more structured assessments improved the prediction of risk, research has largely been inconsistent regarding their accuracy. As a result, new procedures were developed, and best practice now involves structured professional judgment, a combination of the actuarial and clinical judgment approaches. Risk assessment is not yet an exact science; although there are advantages to each of the approaches, there are also disadvantages; and, finally, discussions of risk need to be undertaken from a responsible perspective, particularly when communicating risk. Risk assessment is common practice in high-stakes cases, such as those involving civil commitment. Therefore, and particularly given the lack of guidelines, when communicating risk, it is important to be cautious and transparent about the issues of the tools used. The chapter outlines examples of good practice, as well as examples of unprofessional practice, concluding with suggestions on what to do when harm is likely or imminent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944406918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-323-29460-7.00009-0

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-323-29460-7.00009-0

M3 - Other chapter contribution

SN - 9780323294607

SP - 172

EP - 189

BT - Applied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims

A2 - Petherick, W

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Gormley J, Petherick W. Risk Assessment. In Petherick W, editor, Applied Crime Analysis: A Social Science Approach to Understanding Crime, Criminals, and Victims. Elsevier. 2014. p. 172-189 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-29460-7.00009-0