TY - JOUR
T1 - Richardson v Oracle more than half a decade on: Did the 'ground break' for victim compensation?
AU - Taylor, Joshua
AU - Taylor, Alice
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - In 2014, the decision in Richardson v Oracle significantly increased compensation awards for victims of discrimination and sexual harassment. Commentators referred to the decision as ‘ground-breaking’ and hypothesised that the floodgates would open for sexual harassment and discrimination cases. This article reviews these claims seven years on and asks: did the floodgates open? Case law review and analysis concludes that, while the ground did not break open for victims of discrimination and sexual harassment, it has certainly cracked – although unevenly. As such, more is required to create truly just outcomes for victims in discrimination law.
AB - In 2014, the decision in Richardson v Oracle significantly increased compensation awards for victims of discrimination and sexual harassment. Commentators referred to the decision as ‘ground-breaking’ and hypothesised that the floodgates would open for sexual harassment and discrimination cases. This article reviews these claims seven years on and asks: did the floodgates open? Case law review and analysis concludes that, while the ground did not break open for victims of discrimination and sexual harassment, it has certainly cracked – although unevenly. As such, more is required to create truly just outcomes for victims in discrimination law.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121814534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1037969X211052706
DO - 10.1177/1037969X211052706
M3 - Article
SN - 1037-969X
VL - 47
SP - 36
EP - 40
JO - Alternative Law Journal
JF - Alternative Law Journal
IS - 1
ER -