Reviewing the Reviewers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review


This article reflects on the authors' experience with the review process in academia. It suggests that, while in many cases the treatment of submitted material was professional and respectful, in other cases reviewers did not make helpful comments, and may have been motivated by disagreement with the views expressed in the article, or misunderstanding of arguments made.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-267
Number of pages5
JournalAlternative Law Journal
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing the Reviewers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this