Review of Fiona Black, The artifice of Love: Grotesque bodies and the song of songs: [book review]

Julie-Anne Kelso

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewResearch

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

What do we presume when we read or hear a love poem? We presume that the depiction of the lovers will be flattering, surely? Even if the beloved is not described as beautiful by our own cultural standards or perhaps even those of the poet’s, the reader understands that the lover-poet will ultimately look beyond those flaws and still convey something special, indeed beautiful, and this will be the truth, not some false flattery. It is not simply that beauty is in the eye of the beholder; when it comes to love, it quite legitimately can be the case that love is blind. Nevertheless, readers of the Song of Songs have long been perplexed by the poetic rendering of the lovers bodies. Such readers presume that, given that this is a love song, the overall picture has to be a flattering one. Each lover, in seeking to represent their beloved’s body, must surely be striving for an image of beauty, or at least to convey the beauty that (only) they see. And yet, the text time and again proffers only curious, even absurd imagery that confounds any real sense of understanding on the part of the reader. Quite simply, we are not really convinced. As Fiona Black points out in her superb book The Artifice of Love: Grotesque Bodies and the Song of Songs, biblical critics are troubled by these strange bodies because they jar with the ideals we expect to encounter when we read or hear a love poem. Furthermore, such critics have gone to great lengths to smooth over these problematic descriptions. There is a long history of various readers’ attempts to untangle the often mysterious images used to convey the “beauty” of the beloved (a long neck is one thing, but a neck like the tower of Babylon? Or, breasts like gazelles?).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-88
Number of pages5
JournalThe Bible and Critical Theory
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Artifice
Reader
Song of Songs
Grotesque
Lovers
Poet
Love Poems
Beloved
Imagery
Ideal
Length
Rendering
Gazelle
Love Song
Jar
History
Babel
Tower
Poetics

Cite this

@article{74378af548f34beeb7727c6fcbac0450,
title = "Review of Fiona Black, The artifice of Love: Grotesque bodies and the song of songs: [book review]",
abstract = "What do we presume when we read or hear a love poem? We presume that the depiction of the lovers will be flattering, surely? Even if the beloved is not described as beautiful by our own cultural standards or perhaps even those of the poet’s, the reader understands that the lover-poet will ultimately look beyond those flaws and still convey something special, indeed beautiful, and this will be the truth, not some false flattery. It is not simply that beauty is in the eye of the beholder; when it comes to love, it quite legitimately can be the case that love is blind. Nevertheless, readers of the Song of Songs have long been perplexed by the poetic rendering of the lovers bodies. Such readers presume that, given that this is a love song, the overall picture has to be a flattering one. Each lover, in seeking to represent their beloved’s body, must surely be striving for an image of beauty, or at least to convey the beauty that (only) they see. And yet, the text time and again proffers only curious, even absurd imagery that confounds any real sense of understanding on the part of the reader. Quite simply, we are not really convinced. As Fiona Black points out in her superb book The Artifice of Love: Grotesque Bodies and the Song of Songs, biblical critics are troubled by these strange bodies because they jar with the ideals we expect to encounter when we read or hear a love poem. Furthermore, such critics have gone to great lengths to smooth over these problematic descriptions. There is a long history of various readers’ attempts to untangle the often mysterious images used to convey the “beauty” of the beloved (a long neck is one thing, but a neck like the tower of Babylon? Or, breasts like gazelles?).",
author = "Julie-Anne Kelso",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.2104/bct.v7i1.357",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "84--88",
journal = "The Bible and Critical Theory",
issn = "1832-3391",
publisher = "Monash University ePress",
number = "1",

}

Review of Fiona Black, The artifice of Love: Grotesque bodies and the song of songs : [book review]. / Kelso, Julie-Anne.

In: The Bible and Critical Theory, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011, p. 84-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of Fiona Black, The artifice of Love: Grotesque bodies and the song of songs

T2 - [book review]

AU - Kelso, Julie-Anne

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - What do we presume when we read or hear a love poem? We presume that the depiction of the lovers will be flattering, surely? Even if the beloved is not described as beautiful by our own cultural standards or perhaps even those of the poet’s, the reader understands that the lover-poet will ultimately look beyond those flaws and still convey something special, indeed beautiful, and this will be the truth, not some false flattery. It is not simply that beauty is in the eye of the beholder; when it comes to love, it quite legitimately can be the case that love is blind. Nevertheless, readers of the Song of Songs have long been perplexed by the poetic rendering of the lovers bodies. Such readers presume that, given that this is a love song, the overall picture has to be a flattering one. Each lover, in seeking to represent their beloved’s body, must surely be striving for an image of beauty, or at least to convey the beauty that (only) they see. And yet, the text time and again proffers only curious, even absurd imagery that confounds any real sense of understanding on the part of the reader. Quite simply, we are not really convinced. As Fiona Black points out in her superb book The Artifice of Love: Grotesque Bodies and the Song of Songs, biblical critics are troubled by these strange bodies because they jar with the ideals we expect to encounter when we read or hear a love poem. Furthermore, such critics have gone to great lengths to smooth over these problematic descriptions. There is a long history of various readers’ attempts to untangle the often mysterious images used to convey the “beauty” of the beloved (a long neck is one thing, but a neck like the tower of Babylon? Or, breasts like gazelles?).

AB - What do we presume when we read or hear a love poem? We presume that the depiction of the lovers will be flattering, surely? Even if the beloved is not described as beautiful by our own cultural standards or perhaps even those of the poet’s, the reader understands that the lover-poet will ultimately look beyond those flaws and still convey something special, indeed beautiful, and this will be the truth, not some false flattery. It is not simply that beauty is in the eye of the beholder; when it comes to love, it quite legitimately can be the case that love is blind. Nevertheless, readers of the Song of Songs have long been perplexed by the poetic rendering of the lovers bodies. Such readers presume that, given that this is a love song, the overall picture has to be a flattering one. Each lover, in seeking to represent their beloved’s body, must surely be striving for an image of beauty, or at least to convey the beauty that (only) they see. And yet, the text time and again proffers only curious, even absurd imagery that confounds any real sense of understanding on the part of the reader. Quite simply, we are not really convinced. As Fiona Black points out in her superb book The Artifice of Love: Grotesque Bodies and the Song of Songs, biblical critics are troubled by these strange bodies because they jar with the ideals we expect to encounter when we read or hear a love poem. Furthermore, such critics have gone to great lengths to smooth over these problematic descriptions. There is a long history of various readers’ attempts to untangle the often mysterious images used to convey the “beauty” of the beloved (a long neck is one thing, but a neck like the tower of Babylon? Or, breasts like gazelles?).

U2 - 10.2104/bct.v7i1.357

DO - 10.2104/bct.v7i1.357

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

VL - 7

SP - 84

EP - 88

JO - The Bible and Critical Theory

JF - The Bible and Critical Theory

SN - 1832-3391

IS - 1

ER -