Rethinking mediation ethics: A contextual method to support party self-determination

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In the current ethical paradigm of mediation practice there is a problematic dissonance
between achieving mediator impartiality and relational party self-determination. Without a
reliable ethical foundation for mediation practice, the legitimacy and credibility of the
process is brought into question. This article considers the possibility of an alternative
ethical approach in mediation; a contextual ethical method, with the pursuit of relational
party self-determination as its foundational tenet and norm. This approach would free
mediators to use their professional judgment, and their moral agency, to make ethical
decisions to ensure that the promise of relational party self-determination is made possible
and real.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralasian Dispute Resolution Journal
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

self-determination
mediation
moral philosophy
credibility
legitimacy
paradigm

Cite this

@article{b85f8527b70e4a27a4e5ce23eaacbd16,
title = "Rethinking mediation ethics: A contextual method to support party self-determination",
abstract = "In the current ethical paradigm of mediation practice there is a problematic dissonancebetween achieving mediator impartiality and relational party self-determination. Without areliable ethical foundation for mediation practice, the legitimacy and credibility of theprocess is brought into question. This article considers the possibility of an alternativeethical approach in mediation; a contextual ethical method, with the pursuit of relationalparty self-determination as its foundational tenet and norm. This approach would freemediators to use their professional judgment, and their moral agency, to make ethicaldecisions to ensure that the promise of relational party self-determination is made possibleand real.",
author = "Field, {Rachael M}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal",
issn = "1441-7847",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "1",

}

Rethinking mediation ethics : A contextual method to support party self-determination. / Field, Rachael M.

In: Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, 02.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking mediation ethics

T2 - A contextual method to support party self-determination

AU - Field, Rachael M

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - In the current ethical paradigm of mediation practice there is a problematic dissonancebetween achieving mediator impartiality and relational party self-determination. Without areliable ethical foundation for mediation practice, the legitimacy and credibility of theprocess is brought into question. This article considers the possibility of an alternativeethical approach in mediation; a contextual ethical method, with the pursuit of relationalparty self-determination as its foundational tenet and norm. This approach would freemediators to use their professional judgment, and their moral agency, to make ethicaldecisions to ensure that the promise of relational party self-determination is made possibleand real.

AB - In the current ethical paradigm of mediation practice there is a problematic dissonancebetween achieving mediator impartiality and relational party self-determination. Without areliable ethical foundation for mediation practice, the legitimacy and credibility of theprocess is brought into question. This article considers the possibility of an alternativeethical approach in mediation; a contextual ethical method, with the pursuit of relationalparty self-determination as its foundational tenet and norm. This approach would freemediators to use their professional judgment, and their moral agency, to make ethicaldecisions to ensure that the promise of relational party self-determination is made possibleand real.

UR - http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/australasian-dispute-resolution-journal/

M3 - Article

VL - 22

JO - Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal

JF - Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal

SN - 1441-7847

IS - 1

ER -