Activities per year
outdated sources of law ill-equipped for modern society. The focus on the territorial vs
extraterritorial dichotomy is misguided and harmful, and the territoriality principle is not
appropriate as the jurisprudential foundation of jurisdiction.
This paper argues that the traditional categorisation of three types of jurisdiction needs to be
amended or reconsidered. It also advances an alternative jurisprudential framework for jurisdiction
– applicable for both public, and private, international law – consisting of three core principles.
Further, it brings attention to a selection of novel concepts, including: ‘jurisdictional
interoperability’, ‘bite’ vs. ‘bark’ jurisdiction, ‘scope of jurisdiction’, and ‘lagom jurisdiction’.
|Publication status||Unpublished - 9 Aug 2019|
|Event||Technology and Jurisdiction in Outer Space and Cyberspace Colloquium - Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia|
Duration: 9 Aug 2019 → 9 Aug 2019
|Conference||Technology and Jurisdiction in Outer Space and Cyberspace Colloquium|
|Period||9/08/19 → 9/08/19|
Dan Svantesson (Organiser), Danielle Ireland-Piper (Co-facilitator), Jonathan Crowe (Co-facilitator), Rebecca Azzopardi (Member of programme committee), Nathan Mark (Member of programme committee), William Van Caenegem (Facilitator), Steven Freeland (Participant), Donna Lawler (Participant), Monique Mann (Participant), Rita Matulionyte (Participant), David Rolph (Participant) & Sascha-Dominik Bachmann (Participant)9 Aug 2019
Activity: Participating in or organising an event › Organising a conference, workshop, ...