Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rethinking game consumption in tourism: a case of the 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia outbreak in China

  • Tianyu Ying
  • , Kaiyun Wang
  • , Xinyi Liu*
  • , Jun Wen
  • , Edmund Goh
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This opinion piece highlights a lethal connection between novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) and wildlife consumption in tourism. While NCP continues to make headlines in the mainstream media, little academic research has considered this illness, especially through the lens of food neophilic tourism. Yet this research stream requires attention, particularly because food is a key motivational factor behind tourists’ travel and destination choices. In the case of food neophilic tourism, visitors directly consume wildlife and other exotic cuisine. Unfortunately, this novelty-seeking behavior may pose health risks; wild and exotic animals can carry deadly viruses that have been found to trigger global health epidemics such as SARS, H1N1, bird flu, and NCP. Despite international government agencies’ legislative efforts to control wild and exotic animal consumption, demand from food neophilic tourists continues to increase. This paper initiates a dialogue urging tourism scholars to study food tourism and offers practical and theoretical insight to contextualize this perennial and pertinent phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-309
Number of pages6
JournalTourism Recreation Research
Volume46
Issue number2
Early online date20 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking game consumption in tourism: a case of the 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia outbreak in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this