Resting metabolic rate and anthropometry in older people: A comparison of measured and calculated values

D P Reidlinger, J M Willis, K Whelan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of energy expenditure and anthropometry in older people is important for targeted nutritional support. The present study aimed to compare measured and calculated resting metabolic rate (m-RMR and c-RMR) and measured, calculated and estimated weight and height in older people aged ≥70 years.

METHODS: Participants were healthy older people aged ≥70 years. Indirect calorimetry using a ventilated hood calorimeter was performed for 30 min on fasted participants, and was compared with c-RMR, as calculated using six commonly used equations. Measured, calculated and estimated height and weight were compared.

RESULTS: Subjects comprised 14 males and 20 females and mean (SD) m-RMR was 5243 (845) kJ day(-1) [1253 (202) kcal day(-1) ]. The Mifflin St-Jeor equation was the most consistently accurate, with the smallest mean difference between m-RMR and c-RMR of 58 (553) kJ day(-1) [14 (132) kcal day(-1) ] and c-RMR was within 10% of m-RMR in the greatest number of participants (n = 24; 70%). The Schofield equation was among the least accurate in this age group. In older males, self-reported height and weight were accurate, whereas, in females or those unable to self-report height, ulna length was the most accurate alternative to measured height.

CONCLUSIONS: Current equations used to calculate RMR in older people have inaccuracies, although the Mifflin St-Jeor equation was most accurate. Future studies should investigate the validity, reliability, cost and practicality of using fat free mass as an item in novel equations to calculate RMR in this age group. Self-reported height and weight in males, and height calculated from ulna length in females, were the most accurate alternatives to measured values in the present study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-84
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Volume28
Issue number1
Early online date14 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Basal Metabolism
Anthropometry
Weights and Measures
Ulna
Age Groups
Indirect Calorimetry
Nutritional Support
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report
Energy Metabolism
Healthy Volunteers
Fats
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

@article{4f0e6e587901454ab7f8839e88f7281d,
title = "Resting metabolic rate and anthropometry in older people: A comparison of measured and calculated values",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of energy expenditure and anthropometry in older people is important for targeted nutritional support. The present study aimed to compare measured and calculated resting metabolic rate (m-RMR and c-RMR) and measured, calculated and estimated weight and height in older people aged ≥70 years.METHODS: Participants were healthy older people aged ≥70 years. Indirect calorimetry using a ventilated hood calorimeter was performed for 30 min on fasted participants, and was compared with c-RMR, as calculated using six commonly used equations. Measured, calculated and estimated height and weight were compared.RESULTS: Subjects comprised 14 males and 20 females and mean (SD) m-RMR was 5243 (845) kJ day(-1) [1253 (202) kcal day(-1) ]. The Mifflin St-Jeor equation was the most consistently accurate, with the smallest mean difference between m-RMR and c-RMR of 58 (553) kJ day(-1) [14 (132) kcal day(-1) ] and c-RMR was within 10{\%} of m-RMR in the greatest number of participants (n = 24; 70{\%}). The Schofield equation was among the least accurate in this age group. In older males, self-reported height and weight were accurate, whereas, in females or those unable to self-report height, ulna length was the most accurate alternative to measured height.CONCLUSIONS: Current equations used to calculate RMR in older people have inaccuracies, although the Mifflin St-Jeor equation was most accurate. Future studies should investigate the validity, reliability, cost and practicality of using fat free mass as an item in novel equations to calculate RMR in this age group. Self-reported height and weight in males, and height calculated from ulna length in females, were the most accurate alternatives to measured values in the present study.",
author = "Reidlinger, {D P} and Willis, {J M} and K Whelan",
note = "{\circledC} 2014 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/jhn.12215",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "72--84",
journal = "Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "0952-3871",
publisher = "Wiley-Academy",
number = "1",

}

Resting metabolic rate and anthropometry in older people : A comparison of measured and calculated values. / Reidlinger, D P; Willis, J M; Whelan, K.

In: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 28, No. 1, 02.2015, p. 72-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resting metabolic rate and anthropometry in older people

T2 - A comparison of measured and calculated values

AU - Reidlinger, D P

AU - Willis, J M

AU - Whelan, K

N1 - © 2014 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of energy expenditure and anthropometry in older people is important for targeted nutritional support. The present study aimed to compare measured and calculated resting metabolic rate (m-RMR and c-RMR) and measured, calculated and estimated weight and height in older people aged ≥70 years.METHODS: Participants were healthy older people aged ≥70 years. Indirect calorimetry using a ventilated hood calorimeter was performed for 30 min on fasted participants, and was compared with c-RMR, as calculated using six commonly used equations. Measured, calculated and estimated height and weight were compared.RESULTS: Subjects comprised 14 males and 20 females and mean (SD) m-RMR was 5243 (845) kJ day(-1) [1253 (202) kcal day(-1) ]. The Mifflin St-Jeor equation was the most consistently accurate, with the smallest mean difference between m-RMR and c-RMR of 58 (553) kJ day(-1) [14 (132) kcal day(-1) ] and c-RMR was within 10% of m-RMR in the greatest number of participants (n = 24; 70%). The Schofield equation was among the least accurate in this age group. In older males, self-reported height and weight were accurate, whereas, in females or those unable to self-report height, ulna length was the most accurate alternative to measured height.CONCLUSIONS: Current equations used to calculate RMR in older people have inaccuracies, although the Mifflin St-Jeor equation was most accurate. Future studies should investigate the validity, reliability, cost and practicality of using fat free mass as an item in novel equations to calculate RMR in this age group. Self-reported height and weight in males, and height calculated from ulna length in females, were the most accurate alternatives to measured values in the present study.

AB - BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of energy expenditure and anthropometry in older people is important for targeted nutritional support. The present study aimed to compare measured and calculated resting metabolic rate (m-RMR and c-RMR) and measured, calculated and estimated weight and height in older people aged ≥70 years.METHODS: Participants were healthy older people aged ≥70 years. Indirect calorimetry using a ventilated hood calorimeter was performed for 30 min on fasted participants, and was compared with c-RMR, as calculated using six commonly used equations. Measured, calculated and estimated height and weight were compared.RESULTS: Subjects comprised 14 males and 20 females and mean (SD) m-RMR was 5243 (845) kJ day(-1) [1253 (202) kcal day(-1) ]. The Mifflin St-Jeor equation was the most consistently accurate, with the smallest mean difference between m-RMR and c-RMR of 58 (553) kJ day(-1) [14 (132) kcal day(-1) ] and c-RMR was within 10% of m-RMR in the greatest number of participants (n = 24; 70%). The Schofield equation was among the least accurate in this age group. In older males, self-reported height and weight were accurate, whereas, in females or those unable to self-report height, ulna length was the most accurate alternative to measured height.CONCLUSIONS: Current equations used to calculate RMR in older people have inaccuracies, although the Mifflin St-Jeor equation was most accurate. Future studies should investigate the validity, reliability, cost and practicality of using fat free mass as an item in novel equations to calculate RMR in this age group. Self-reported height and weight in males, and height calculated from ulna length in females, were the most accurate alternatives to measured values in the present study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921775787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jhn.12215

DO - 10.1111/jhn.12215

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 72

EP - 84

JO - Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 0952-3871

IS - 1

ER -