Response to methodological series: Advancing statistical rigour in critical care research-a call for quantified collaboration and precision-based sample rationale

Ian Paul Hughes; Madeleen van der Merwe; Mark Jones

doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101506

Response to methodological series: Advancing statistical rigour in critical care research-a call for quantified collaboration and precision-based sample rationale

Ian Paul Hughes^*
, Madeleen van der Merwe
, Mark Jones

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

Abstract

We were pleased to read the Letter to the Editor by Cheng in response to our paper “How to understand, critically appraise, and write the Statistical Methods section of a clinical research paper”.1 We welcome any contribution that addresses the challenge to improve the use and understanding of statistical methodologies in clinical research.

Original language	English
Article number	101506
Journal	Australian Critical Care
Volume	39
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101506
Publication status	Published - Feb 2026

Access to Document

10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101506

Cite this

@article{7a2e613bff914658b1bb98b20f6fc420,

title = "Response to methodological series: Advancing statistical rigour in critical care research-a call for quantified collaboration and precision-based sample rationale",

abstract = "We were pleased to read the Letter to the Editor by Cheng in response to our paper “How to understand, critically appraise, and write the Statistical Methods section of a clinical research paper”.1 We welcome any contribution that addresses the challenge to improve the use and understanding of statistical methodologies in clinical research.",

author = "Hughes, \{Ian Paul\} and \{van der Merwe\}, Madeleen and Mark Jones",

year = "2026",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101506",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

journal = "Australian Critical Care",

issn = "1036-7314",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to methodological series: Advancing statistical rigour in critical care research-a call for quantified collaboration and precision-based sample rationale

AU - Hughes, Ian Paul

AU - van der Merwe, Madeleen

AU - Jones, Mark

PY - 2026/2

Y1 - 2026/2

N2 - We were pleased to read the Letter to the Editor by Cheng in response to our paper “How to understand, critically appraise, and write the Statistical Methods section of a clinical research paper”.1 We welcome any contribution that addresses the challenge to improve the use and understanding of statistical methodologies in clinical research.

AB - We were pleased to read the Letter to the Editor by Cheng in response to our paper “How to understand, critically appraise, and write the Statistical Methods section of a clinical research paper”.1 We welcome any contribution that addresses the challenge to improve the use and understanding of statistical methodologies in clinical research.

U2 - 10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101506

DO - 10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101506

M3 - Letter

C2 - 41512801

SN - 1036-7314

VL - 39

JO - Australian Critical Care

JF - Australian Critical Care

IS - 1

M1 - 101506

ER -

Response to methodological series: Advancing statistical rigour in critical care research-a call for quantified collaboration and precision-based sample rationale

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this