Response to 'Effects of parity on lifestyle changes: from a methodological perspective to societal applications'

Maureen Makama; Arul Earnest; Siew Lim; Helen Skouteris; Briony Hill; Helena Teede; Jacqueline A. Boyle; Wendy J. Brown; Allison M. Hodge; Lisa J. Moran

doi:10.1093/ije/dyad017

Response to 'Effects of parity on lifestyle changes: from a methodological perspective to societal applications'

Maureen Makama, Arul Earnest, Siew Lim, Helen Skouteris, Briony Hill, Helena Teede, Jacqueline A. Boyle, Wendy J. Brown, Allison M. Hodge, Lisa J. Moran^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

Abstract

We appreciate the interest of Anamege and Perez-Carreno in our article titled ‘Assessing patterns of change in lifestyle behaviours by parity: a longitudinal cohort study’.1 We are also grateful to the editor for the opportunity to respond and to provide further details about our work.

We excluded all respondents with implausible energy intake (n = 286) from all analyses (these were not part of the 4927 participants included in the final analysis). We only excluded the 573 women who were pregnant in sensitivity analysis to explore the impact of pregnancy including confounding (these were included in the 4927 participants in the final analysis).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	645-646
Number of pages	2
Journal	International Journal of Epidemiology
Volume	52
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyad017
Publication status	Published - 19 Apr 2023
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1093/ije/dyad017

Cite this

@article{55c303eb39a44fc59e1a33bb132a5ad0,

title = "Response to 'Effects of parity on lifestyle changes: from a methodological perspective to societal applications'",

abstract = "We appreciate the interest of Anamege and Perez-Carreno in our article titled {\textquoteleft}Assessing patterns of change in lifestyle behaviours by parity: a longitudinal cohort study{\textquoteright}.1 We are also grateful to the editor for the opportunity to respond and to provide further details about our work.We excluded all respondents with implausible energy intake (n = 286) from all analyses (these were not part of the 4927 participants included in the final analysis). We only excluded the 573 women who were pregnant in sensitivity analysis to explore the impact of pregnancy including confounding (these were included in the 4927 participants in the final analysis).",

author = "Maureen Makama and Arul Earnest and Siew Lim and Helen Skouteris and Briony Hill and Helena Teede and Boyle, {Jacqueline A.} and Brown, {Wendy J.} and Hodge, {Allison M.} and Moran, {Lisa J.}",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1093/ije/dyad017",

language = "English",

volume = "52",

pages = "645--646",

journal = "International Journal of Epidemiology",

issn = "0300-5771",

publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to 'Effects of parity on lifestyle changes: from a methodological perspective to societal applications'

AU - Makama, Maureen

AU - Earnest, Arul

AU - Lim, Siew

AU - Skouteris, Helen

AU - Hill, Briony

AU - Teede, Helena

AU - Boyle, Jacqueline A.

AU - Brown, Wendy J.

AU - Hodge, Allison M.

AU - Moran, Lisa J.

PY - 2023/4/19

Y1 - 2023/4/19

N2 - We appreciate the interest of Anamege and Perez-Carreno in our article titled ‘Assessing patterns of change in lifestyle behaviours by parity: a longitudinal cohort study’.1 We are also grateful to the editor for the opportunity to respond and to provide further details about our work.We excluded all respondents with implausible energy intake (n = 286) from all analyses (these were not part of the 4927 participants included in the final analysis). We only excluded the 573 women who were pregnant in sensitivity analysis to explore the impact of pregnancy including confounding (these were included in the 4927 participants in the final analysis).

AB - We appreciate the interest of Anamege and Perez-Carreno in our article titled ‘Assessing patterns of change in lifestyle behaviours by parity: a longitudinal cohort study’.1 We are also grateful to the editor for the opportunity to respond and to provide further details about our work.We excluded all respondents with implausible energy intake (n = 286) from all analyses (these were not part of the 4927 participants included in the final analysis). We only excluded the 573 women who were pregnant in sensitivity analysis to explore the impact of pregnancy including confounding (these were included in the 4927 participants in the final analysis).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152971114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyad017

DO - 10.1093/ije/dyad017

M3 - Letter

C2 - 36811390

AN - SCOPUS:85152971114

SN - 0300-5771

VL - 52

SP - 645

EP - 646

JO - International Journal of Epidemiology

JF - International Journal of Epidemiology

IS - 2

ER -

Response to 'Effects of parity on lifestyle changes: from a methodological perspective to societal applications'

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this