Resilience and wellbeing of small inland communities

Community assets as key determinants

Darryl Maybery, Rodney Pope, Gene Hodgins, Yvonne Hitchenor, Amanda Shepherd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The current climatic conditions and ongoing changes in the farming sector constitute stressful circumstances that impact on the well-being of many Australian rural communities. In these circumstances, small towns and communities are at particular risk due to their relative isolation from services and resources. However, rural communities are noted for being resilient, or able to successfully adapt to stressful circumstances, with well-being both a determinant and outcome of this resilience. This study operationalised a model of resilience, risk and well-being that examined community assets important for resilience of small, inland rural communities. Methods: 102 participants from eight outer regional or remote towns and communities in the northern Riverina region of New South Wales (Australia) completed survey items developed from the community resilience model and the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI). Results: Social assets including parents and citizens associations (P&C), sporting clubs and groups, and service agency assets including schools were rated as the assets of most benefit to the community and the PWI results were similar to Australian norms, suggesting these communities were resilient. Conclusions: Identifying schools, sporting and other clubs as prominent social assets highlights the role these rural agencies play to maintain and sustain relationships and connectedness of community members. When developing interventions or support services, program and policy makers should recognise these social assets for their contribution to the resilience and well-being of rural environments. The model of community resilience provides a framework that is useful for future policy development, planning, interventions and research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-339
Number of pages14
JournalRural Society
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

small town
policy development
resource
services
Resilience
Well-being
Assets
index
school
Rural communities
norm
rural environment
planning
citizen
policy
method
programme
Clubs

Cite this

Maybery, Darryl ; Pope, Rodney ; Hodgins, Gene ; Hitchenor, Yvonne ; Shepherd, Amanda. / Resilience and wellbeing of small inland communities : Community assets as key determinants. In: Rural Society. 2009 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 326-339.
@article{ae25f7a543814d1b82469323f3f192e7,
title = "Resilience and wellbeing of small inland communities: Community assets as key determinants",
abstract = "Introduction: The current climatic conditions and ongoing changes in the farming sector constitute stressful circumstances that impact on the well-being of many Australian rural communities. In these circumstances, small towns and communities are at particular risk due to their relative isolation from services and resources. However, rural communities are noted for being resilient, or able to successfully adapt to stressful circumstances, with well-being both a determinant and outcome of this resilience. This study operationalised a model of resilience, risk and well-being that examined community assets important for resilience of small, inland rural communities. Methods: 102 participants from eight outer regional or remote towns and communities in the northern Riverina region of New South Wales (Australia) completed survey items developed from the community resilience model and the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI). Results: Social assets including parents and citizens associations (P&C), sporting clubs and groups, and service agency assets including schools were rated as the assets of most benefit to the community and the PWI results were similar to Australian norms, suggesting these communities were resilient. Conclusions: Identifying schools, sporting and other clubs as prominent social assets highlights the role these rural agencies play to maintain and sustain relationships and connectedness of community members. When developing interventions or support services, program and policy makers should recognise these social assets for their contribution to the resilience and well-being of rural environments. The model of community resilience provides a framework that is useful for future policy development, planning, interventions and research.",
author = "Darryl Maybery and Rodney Pope and Gene Hodgins and Yvonne Hitchenor and Amanda Shepherd",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.5172/rsj.351.19.4.326",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "326--339",
journal = "Rural Society",
issn = "1037-1656",
publisher = "eContent Management Pty Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Maybery, D, Pope, R, Hodgins, G, Hitchenor, Y & Shepherd, A 2009, 'Resilience and wellbeing of small inland communities: Community assets as key determinants', Rural Society, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 326-339. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.351.19.4.326

Resilience and wellbeing of small inland communities : Community assets as key determinants. / Maybery, Darryl; Pope, Rodney; Hodgins, Gene; Hitchenor, Yvonne; Shepherd, Amanda.

In: Rural Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 326-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience and wellbeing of small inland communities

T2 - Community assets as key determinants

AU - Maybery, Darryl

AU - Pope, Rodney

AU - Hodgins, Gene

AU - Hitchenor, Yvonne

AU - Shepherd, Amanda

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Introduction: The current climatic conditions and ongoing changes in the farming sector constitute stressful circumstances that impact on the well-being of many Australian rural communities. In these circumstances, small towns and communities are at particular risk due to their relative isolation from services and resources. However, rural communities are noted for being resilient, or able to successfully adapt to stressful circumstances, with well-being both a determinant and outcome of this resilience. This study operationalised a model of resilience, risk and well-being that examined community assets important for resilience of small, inland rural communities. Methods: 102 participants from eight outer regional or remote towns and communities in the northern Riverina region of New South Wales (Australia) completed survey items developed from the community resilience model and the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI). Results: Social assets including parents and citizens associations (P&C), sporting clubs and groups, and service agency assets including schools were rated as the assets of most benefit to the community and the PWI results were similar to Australian norms, suggesting these communities were resilient. Conclusions: Identifying schools, sporting and other clubs as prominent social assets highlights the role these rural agencies play to maintain and sustain relationships and connectedness of community members. When developing interventions or support services, program and policy makers should recognise these social assets for their contribution to the resilience and well-being of rural environments. The model of community resilience provides a framework that is useful for future policy development, planning, interventions and research.

AB - Introduction: The current climatic conditions and ongoing changes in the farming sector constitute stressful circumstances that impact on the well-being of many Australian rural communities. In these circumstances, small towns and communities are at particular risk due to their relative isolation from services and resources. However, rural communities are noted for being resilient, or able to successfully adapt to stressful circumstances, with well-being both a determinant and outcome of this resilience. This study operationalised a model of resilience, risk and well-being that examined community assets important for resilience of small, inland rural communities. Methods: 102 participants from eight outer regional or remote towns and communities in the northern Riverina region of New South Wales (Australia) completed survey items developed from the community resilience model and the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI). Results: Social assets including parents and citizens associations (P&C), sporting clubs and groups, and service agency assets including schools were rated as the assets of most benefit to the community and the PWI results were similar to Australian norms, suggesting these communities were resilient. Conclusions: Identifying schools, sporting and other clubs as prominent social assets highlights the role these rural agencies play to maintain and sustain relationships and connectedness of community members. When developing interventions or support services, program and policy makers should recognise these social assets for their contribution to the resilience and well-being of rural environments. The model of community resilience provides a framework that is useful for future policy development, planning, interventions and research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650910539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5172/rsj.351.19.4.326

DO - 10.5172/rsj.351.19.4.326

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 326

EP - 339

JO - Rural Society

JF - Rural Society

SN - 1037-1656

IS - 4

ER -