Abstract
Models of human face recognition rely on the notion of representation, but rarely describe this in detail. Here, I will argue that our conception of face representations is often ‘essentialist’ – assuming that there is some fixed set of values that captures a particular person’s face. However, this conception is inadequate for the purpose of familiar face recognition, and I will suggest that representations instead need to incorporate the statistical properties of our exposure to all the faces we know, including variability and sampling. I will review findings from empirical and simulation research suggesting that the idiosyncratic properties of each perceiver results in a unique set of representations, which can be difficult to understand using traditional experimental approaches. Methodological diversity seems to offer the best route for understanding face recognition – a problem that remains stubbornly unsolved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 531-545 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 5 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Representations for face recognition: The 53rd Bartlett Lecture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver