Reporting and replicating trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: Do we know what the researchers actually did?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complete reporting of all components of complex interventions is essential for translation of research evidence into clinical practice. Previous work has highlighted deficiencies in the reporting of nonpharmacological interventions; however, the reporting quality of exercise-based interventions for coronary heart disease has not been examined.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search strategy was used to identify randomized controlled trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation published until December 2013. Fifty-seven trials were included, reporting on 74 interventions. Intervention description completeness was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. Missing intervention details were then sought from additional published material and also by emailing corresponding authors. Only 6 interventions (8%) sufficiently described all required items within the main publication; this increased to 11 (15%) after searching for additional published material and 32 (43%) after contacting trial authors. Although location/setting and duration were consistently well reported in publications, complete descriptions of the exercise schedule, as well as details about its tailoring and progression, were missing for over half of interventions (complete for 42% and 36% of interventions, respectively). Although some authors (25/61) were able to provide missing intervention details when contacted, others could not be located (20) or did not respond (16).

CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate reporting of cardiac rehabilitation interventions is a substantial problem, with essential information frequently missing, and for almost half of all interventions, unobtainable after publication. A conscientious effort to address this problem could facilitate an improvement in the quality of cardiac rehabilitation delivered in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-194
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Publications
Research Personnel
Quality Improvement
Checklist
Coronary Disease
Appointments and Schedules
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
Cardiac Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{4692ad108e1d40e1a96249b6f41b9d23,
title = "Reporting and replicating trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: Do we know what the researchers actually did?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Complete reporting of all components of complex interventions is essential for translation of research evidence into clinical practice. Previous work has highlighted deficiencies in the reporting of nonpharmacological interventions; however, the reporting quality of exercise-based interventions for coronary heart disease has not been examined.METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search strategy was used to identify randomized controlled trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation published until December 2013. Fifty-seven trials were included, reporting on 74 interventions. Intervention description completeness was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. Missing intervention details were then sought from additional published material and also by emailing corresponding authors. Only 6 interventions (8{\%}) sufficiently described all required items within the main publication; this increased to 11 (15{\%}) after searching for additional published material and 32 (43{\%}) after contacting trial authors. Although location/setting and duration were consistently well reported in publications, complete descriptions of the exercise schedule, as well as details about its tailoring and progression, were missing for over half of interventions (complete for 42{\%} and 36{\%} of interventions, respectively). Although some authors (25/61) were able to provide missing intervention details when contacted, others could not be located (20) or did not respond (16).CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate reporting of cardiac rehabilitation interventions is a substantial problem, with essential information frequently missing, and for almost half of all interventions, unobtainable after publication. A conscientious effort to address this problem could facilitate an improvement in the quality of cardiac rehabilitation delivered in clinical practice.",
author = "Bridget Abell and Paul Glasziou and Tammy Hoffmann",
note = "{\circledC} 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001381",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "187--194",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes",
issn = "1941-7705",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Reporting and replicating trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation : Do we know what the researchers actually did? / Abell, Bridget; Glasziou, Paul; Hoffmann, Tammy.

In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Vol. 8, No. 2, 03.2015, p. 187-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reporting and replicating trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation

T2 - Do we know what the researchers actually did?

AU - Abell, Bridget

AU - Glasziou, Paul

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

N1 - © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Complete reporting of all components of complex interventions is essential for translation of research evidence into clinical practice. Previous work has highlighted deficiencies in the reporting of nonpharmacological interventions; however, the reporting quality of exercise-based interventions for coronary heart disease has not been examined.METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search strategy was used to identify randomized controlled trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation published until December 2013. Fifty-seven trials were included, reporting on 74 interventions. Intervention description completeness was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. Missing intervention details were then sought from additional published material and also by emailing corresponding authors. Only 6 interventions (8%) sufficiently described all required items within the main publication; this increased to 11 (15%) after searching for additional published material and 32 (43%) after contacting trial authors. Although location/setting and duration were consistently well reported in publications, complete descriptions of the exercise schedule, as well as details about its tailoring and progression, were missing for over half of interventions (complete for 42% and 36% of interventions, respectively). Although some authors (25/61) were able to provide missing intervention details when contacted, others could not be located (20) or did not respond (16).CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate reporting of cardiac rehabilitation interventions is a substantial problem, with essential information frequently missing, and for almost half of all interventions, unobtainable after publication. A conscientious effort to address this problem could facilitate an improvement in the quality of cardiac rehabilitation delivered in clinical practice.

AB - BACKGROUND: Complete reporting of all components of complex interventions is essential for translation of research evidence into clinical practice. Previous work has highlighted deficiencies in the reporting of nonpharmacological interventions; however, the reporting quality of exercise-based interventions for coronary heart disease has not been examined.METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search strategy was used to identify randomized controlled trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation published until December 2013. Fifty-seven trials were included, reporting on 74 interventions. Intervention description completeness was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. Missing intervention details were then sought from additional published material and also by emailing corresponding authors. Only 6 interventions (8%) sufficiently described all required items within the main publication; this increased to 11 (15%) after searching for additional published material and 32 (43%) after contacting trial authors. Although location/setting and duration were consistently well reported in publications, complete descriptions of the exercise schedule, as well as details about its tailoring and progression, were missing for over half of interventions (complete for 42% and 36% of interventions, respectively). Although some authors (25/61) were able to provide missing intervention details when contacted, others could not be located (20) or did not respond (16).CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate reporting of cardiac rehabilitation interventions is a substantial problem, with essential information frequently missing, and for almost half of all interventions, unobtainable after publication. A conscientious effort to address this problem could facilitate an improvement in the quality of cardiac rehabilitation delivered in clinical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937569313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001381

DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001381

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 187

EP - 194

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

SN - 1941-7705

IS - 2

ER -