Replying to Veatch's concerns: Special moral problems with total artificial heart inactivation

Katrina A. Bramstedt*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Moral problems arise when contemplating the inactivation of total artificial heart technology: however, an ethical obligation to explant the device as part of therapy withdrawal is not one of them. Further, arguments will be presented justifying that inactivation of the device is not morally equivalent to active killing of the patient. When device inactivation is clinically and ethically warranted, this decision should not be unilaterally made by the physician but through thorough discussion with the patient (if possible), the patient's surrogate, and the medical team. Consultation with legal counsel and the hospital ethics committee may also be appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-320
Number of pages4
JournalDeath Studies
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Replying to Veatch's concerns: Special moral problems with total artificial heart inactivation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this