Abstract
Dear Editors
THE UVI working group acknowledges the contribution of Vitamin D to bone health as stated in our paper. However, we concluded that an optimal level of Vitamin D for humans has not yet been established with any certainty. Evidence of the health benefits of Vitamin D unrelated to bone health also has not been unequivocally documented (for a comprehensive review on dietary reference intakes, see www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13050). Contrary to Grant’s views, there is scientific agreement that ecological studies should not be the basis of recommendations to the public, since any observed associations are easily confounded and therefore potentially unreliable.
THE UVI working group acknowledges the contribution of Vitamin D to bone health as stated in our paper. However, we concluded that an optimal level of Vitamin D for humans has not yet been established with any certainty. Evidence of the health benefits of Vitamin D unrelated to bone health also has not been unequivocally documented (for a comprehensive review on dietary reference intakes, see www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13050). Contrary to Grant’s views, there is scientific agreement that ecological studies should not be the basis of recommendations to the public, since any observed associations are easily confounded and therefore potentially unreliable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 115-116 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Health Physics |
Volume | 104 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |