Abstract
One of the aims of our paper “The Paradox of Suicide Prevention” is to promote greater discourse on suicide prevention, with a particular focus on the mental health models used for the identification of, and interventions with, individuals who come into contact with tertiary mental health services. Obegi (2023)’s comments [1] raise a number of helpful points regarding the terminology we used to describe aspects of suicide prevention in relation to how these terms are traditionally used in epidemiology and prevention science. Obegi’s questions provide an opportunity to reinforce and clarify the aims and message of our paper.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 5726 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-3 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Obegi, J.H. Distinguishing Prevention from Treatment in Suicide Prevention. Comment on “Turner et al. The Paradox of Suicide Prevention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14983”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver