Abstract
This article argues for a broader interpretation to be given to s51(1). The section makes a distinction between interstate and overseas trade and commerce, on the one hand, and intrastate trade and commerce, on the other. This distinction is increasingly difficult to make, and arguably it should be sufficient that the business activity affects interstate or overseas trade and commerce. The carveout of manufacturing and production from the provision is also unsatisfactory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-120 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Australian Business Law Review |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |